Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36520273›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2023

A membrane-free microfluidic approach to mucus permeation for efficient differentiation of mucoadhesive and mucopermeating nanoparticulate systems.

Leah Wright, Anthony Wignall, Silver Jõemetsa, Paul Joyce, Clive A Prestidge

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leah WrightUniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Anthony WignallUniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Silver JõemetsaDepartment of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
Paul JoyceUniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Clive A PrestidgeUniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. clive.prestidge@unisa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5401-7535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gastrointestinal mucus barrier is a widely overlooked yet essential component of the intestinal epithelium, responsible for the body's protection against harmful pathogens and particulates. This, coupled with the increasing utilisation of biological molecules as therapeutics (e.g. monoclonal antibodies, RNA vaccines and synthetic proteins) and nanoparticle formulations for drug delivery, necessitates that we consider the additional absorption barrier that the mucus layer may pose. It is imperative that in vitro permeability methods can accurately model this barrier in addition to standardised cellular testing. In this study, a mucus-on-a-chip (MOAC) microfluidic device was engineered and developed to quantify the permeation kinetics of nanoparticles through a biorelevant synthetic mucus layer. Three equivalently sized nanoparticle systems, formulated from chitosan (CSNP), mesoporous silica (MSNP) and poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA-NP) were prepared to encompass various surface chemistries and nanostructures and were assessed for their mucopermeation within the MOAC. Utilising this device, the mucoadhesive behaviour of chitosan nanoparticles was clearly visualised, a phenomenon not often observed via standard permeation models. In contrast, MSNP and PLGA-NP displayed mucopermeation, with significant differences in permeation pattern due to specific mucus-nanoparticle binding. Further optimisation of the MOAC to include a more biorelevant mucus mimic resulted in 5.5-fold hindered PLGA-NP permeation compared to a mucin solution. Furthermore, tracking of PLGA-NP at a single nanoparticle resolution revealed rank-order correlations between particle diffusivity and MOAC permeation. This device, including utilisation of biosimilar mucus, provides a unique ability to quantify both mucoadhesion and mucopenetration of nano-formulations and elucidate mucus binding interactions on a microscopic scale.

Indexed as

ChitosanNanoparticlesDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsIntestinal MucosaMicrofluidicsMucusChitosanDrug CarriersMicrofluidicsMucoadhesionMucopermeationMucusNanoparticlesOrgan-on-a-chip

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.