Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36520267›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2023

Recommendations for the design of video-based educational interventions as instructional tools in robotic surgical training.

Kirsten Larkins, Kristy Mansour, Dan Costello, Matthew Gray, Satish Warrier, Alexander Heriot, Helen Mohan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Instructional Design for Surgical Novices Based on Cognitive Load Theory: Implications for Urologic Surgery Training.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kirsten LarkinsPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Kirstenmlarkins@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7173-259X
Kristy MansourPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Dan CostelloInternational Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Matthew GrayInternational Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Satish WarrierPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alexander HeriotPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Helen MohanPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

Australian Government Professional practice research training scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Video-based instructional tools are an important emerging component of robotic surgical education. However, there is a paucity of literature on the structure of video as an instructional tool in robotic surgery. This paper reviews the literature on video-based instructional tools and provides a series of recommendations for the structure of a video- based training tool in robotic surgery. Key educational aspects to consider in designing a video training tool are student engagement, content validity, cognitive load, and active learning. Key recommendations for structure of instructional videos are that videos should be short, presented in modular blocks with appropriate narration and engagement strategies.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresClinical CompetenceCurriculumEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansVideo RecordingCurriculum designE learningRobotic trainingSurgical educationVideo education

Identifiers

PMID36520267
OpenAlexW4311543111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.