ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023
Fisher ratio feature selection by manual peak area calculations on comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography data using standard mixtures with variable composition, storage, and interferences.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) is becoming increasingly more common for non-targeted characterization of complex volatile mixtures. The information gained with higher peak capacity and sensitivity provides additional sample composition information when one-dimensional GC is not adequate. GC×GC generates complex multivariate data sets when using non-targeted analysis to discover analytes. Fisher ratio (FR) analysis is applied to discern class markers, limiting complex GC×GC profiles to the most discriminating compounds between classes. While many approaches for feature selection using FR analysis exist, FR can be calculated relatively easily directly on peak areas after any native software has performed peak detection. This study evaluated the success rates of manual FR calculation and comparison to a critical F-value for samples analyzed by GC×GC with defined concentration differences. Long-term storage of samples and other spiked interferences were also investigated to examine their impact on analyzing mixtures using this FR feature selection strategy. Success rates were generally high with mostly 90-100% success rates and some instances of percentages between 80 and 90%. There were rare cases of false positives present and a low occurrence of false negatives. When errors were made in the selection of a compound, it was typically due to chromatographic artifacts present in chromatograms and not from the FR approach itself. This work provides foundational experimental data on the use of manual FR calculations for feature selection from GC×GC data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36520202What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.