Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36520202›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023

Fisher ratio feature selection by manual peak area calculations on comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography data using standard mixtures with variable composition, storage, and interferences.

Danson J Oliva, Cynthia Cheung, Katelynn A Perrault

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Danson J OlivaLaboratory of Forensic and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Chaminade University of Honolulu, Honolulu, HI, 96815, USA.
Cynthia CheungLaboratory of Forensic and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Chaminade University of Honolulu, Honolulu, HI, 96815, USA.
Katelynn A PerraultLaboratory of Forensic and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Chaminade University of Honolulu, Honolulu, HI, 96815, USA. Katelynn.perrault@chaminade.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0210-2687

Funding

National Science Foundation 1752607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) is becoming increasingly more common for non-targeted characterization of complex volatile mixtures. The information gained with higher peak capacity and sensitivity provides additional sample composition information when one-dimensional GC is not adequate. GC×GC generates complex multivariate data sets when using non-targeted analysis to discover analytes. Fisher ratio (FR) analysis is applied to discern class markers, limiting complex GC×GC profiles to the most discriminating compounds between classes. While many approaches for feature selection using FR analysis exist, FR can be calculated relatively easily directly on peak areas after any native software has performed peak detection. This study evaluated the success rates of manual FR calculation and comparison to a critical F-value for samples analyzed by GC×GC with defined concentration differences. Long-term storage of samples and other spiked interferences were also investigated to examine their impact on analyzing mixtures using this FR feature selection strategy. Success rates were generally high with mostly 90-100% success rates and some instances of percentages between 80 and 90%. There were rare cases of false positives present and a low occurrence of false negatives. When errors were made in the selection of a compound, it was typically due to chromatographic artifacts present in chromatograms and not from the FR approach itself. This work provides foundational experimental data on the use of manual FR calculations for feature selection from GC×GC data.

Indexed as

ChemometricsFeature selectionGC×GCMultidimensional gas chromatographyNon-targeted analysisVolatile organic compounds (VOCs)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.