Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36519818›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2022

Trial Design Considerations to Increase Older Adult Accrual to National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials.

Jennifer Le-Rademacher, Supriya Mohile, Joseph Unger, Matthew F Hudson, Jared Foster, Stuart Lichtman, Jane Perlmutter, Efrat Dotan, Martine Extermann, Kevin Dodd and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nivolumab+AVD in Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin's Lymphoma.The New England journal of medicine · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Comparison of geriatric assessment with provider's clinical assessment among older adults with gastroesophageal cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Comorbid Dementia and Cancer Therapy Decision-Making: A Scoping Review.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Aging and cancer.Molecular cancer · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell and Bispecific Antibody Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Moving Into the Future.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer Le-RademacherDivision of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Supriya MohileDepartment of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Joseph UngerPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Matthew F HudsonPrisma Health, Greenville, SC, USA.
Jared FosterDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Stuart LichtmanPreviously MSKCC, New York, NY, USA.
Jane PerlmutterGemini.
Efrat DotanDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Martine ExtermannMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Kevin DoddDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
William TewMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Heidi KlepinDepartment of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Tanya M WildesCancer & Aging Research Group, St Louis, MO, USA.
Mina S SedrakDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
Aminah JatoiDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Richard F LittleDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USCapgemini (Netherlands) · NLCity of Hope · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USPrisma Health · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
Targeting Senescence to Improve Frailty in Older Cancer SurvivorsK76AG074918 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SEDRAK, MINA S · 2022 to 2024
$729k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974NIA NIH HHS K76 AG074918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although adults aged 65 years or older make up a strong majority of cancer patients, their underrepresentation in cancer clinical trials leads to the lack of representative data to guide evidence-based therapeutic decisions in this patient population. The Trial Design Working Group, convened as part of the workshop titled, Engaging Older Adults in the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Network: Challenges and Opportunities, recommended study designs and design elements that could improve accrual of older adults in National Cancer Institute-funded clinical trials. These include trials that are specifically designed to enroll older adults, trials that include a cohort of older patients (parallel cohort, stratified cohort, or embedded cohort), and trials with pragmatic design elements to facilitate enrollment of older adults. This manuscript provides brief descriptions of the recommended designs, examples of successful trials, and considerations for implementation of these designs. As with any clinical trial, the scientific questions and trial objectives should drive the study design, the selection of endpoints and intervention, and eligibility criteria. When designing trials that include older adults, the heterogeneity of fitness levels is an important consideration as fitness can influence accrual rates and outcomes. Appropriately incorporating geriatric assessments can help identify the optimal subset of older patients for inclusion and minimize selection bias. Incorporating pragmatic design elements to reduce the burden on trial participants as well as on accruing sites and retaining essential elements to ensure that the main goal of the trial can be accomplished can enhance enrollment without compromising the integrity of trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicNeoplasmsPatient SelectionAgedEligibility DeterminationHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Research DesignUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36519818
PMCPMC9949574
OpenAlexW4311808271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.