Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36519325›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2023

Heikki Kuusanmäki, Sari Kytölä, Ida Vänttinen, Tanja Ruokoranta, Amanda Ranta, Jani Huuhtanen, Minna Suvela, Alun Parsons, Annasofia Holopainen, Anu Partanen and 15 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04267081 (Two-stage, Two-arm, Open-Label Phase II Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacytidine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Selected Using Ex Vivo Drug Sensitivity Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04267081 phase2completednot on this map

Two-stage, Two-arm, Open-Label Phase II Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacytidine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Selected Using Ex Vivo Drug Sensitivity Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelsinki University Central HospitalRan2020 to 2024Enrolled104ConditionsAcute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsVenetoclax
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. iScience · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pandora's Box of AML: HowBiomedicines · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Heikki KuusanmäkiInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Foundation for the Finnish Cancer Institute, Helsinki.
Sari KytöläDepartment of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki.
Ida VänttinenInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Tanja RuokorantaInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Amanda RantaInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Jani HuuhtanenHematology Research Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Minna SuvelaInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Alun ParsonsInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Annasofia HolopainenDepartment of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio.
Anu PartanenDepartment of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio.
Milla E L KuusistoDepartment of Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland; Department of Hematology, University of Oulu, Oulu.
Sirpa KoskelaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere.
Riikka RätyDepartment of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki.
Maija Itälä-RemesDepartment of Clinical Hematology, Turku University Hospital, Turku.
Imre VästrikInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Olli DufvaHematology Research Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Sanna SiitonenDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital.
Kimmo PorkkaDepartment of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland; Hematology Research Unit, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Krister WennerbergBiotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
Caroline A HeckmanInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
Pia EttalaDepartment of Clinical Hematology, Turku University Hospital, Turku.
Marja PyöräläDepartment of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio.
Johanna RimpiläinenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere.
Timo SiitonenDepartment of Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu.
Mika KontroInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Foundation for the Finnish Cancer Institute, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki. mika.kontro@helsinki.fi.
University of Helsinki · FIKuopio University Hospital · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIOulu University Hospital · FITampere University Hospital · FITurku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax has revolutionized the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients not benefiting from intensive chemotherapy. Nevertheless, treatment failure remains a challenge, and predictive markers are needed, particularly for relapsed or refractory AML. Ex vivo drug sensitivity testing may correlate with outcomes, but its prospective predictive value remains unexplored. Here we report the results of the first stage of the prospective phase II VenEx trial evaluating the utility and predictiveness of venetoclax sensitivity testing using different cell culture conditions and cell viability assays in patients receiving venetoclax-azacitidine. Participants with de novo AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, relapsed or refractory AML, or secondary AML were included. The primary endpoint was the treatment response in participants showing ex vivo sensitivity and the key secondary endpoints were the correlation of sensitivity with responses and survival. Venetoclax sensitivity testing was successful in 38/39 participants. Experimental conditions significantly influenced the predictive accuracy. Blast-specific venetoclax sensitivity measured in conditioned medium most accurately correlated with treatment outcomes; 88% of sensitive participants achieved a treatment response. The median survival was significantly longer for participants who were ex vivo-sensitive to venetoclax (14.6 months for venetoclax-sensitive patients vs. 3.5 for venetoclax-insensitive patients, P<0.001). This analysis illustrates the feasibility of integrating drug-response profiling into clinical practice and demonstrates excellent predictivity. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04267081.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicHumansProspective StudiesSulfonamidesAntineoplastic AgentsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicSulfonamidesvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID36519325
PMCPMC10316276
OpenAlexW4311582377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.