ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2023
qNABpredict: Quick, accurate, and taxonomy-aware sequence-based prediction of content of nucleic acid binding amino acids.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- LncRNA-Protein Interactions: A Key to Deciphering LncRNA Mechanisms.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Accurate and Fast Prediction of Intrinsic Disorder Using flDPnn.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Accurate Prediction of Protein-Binding Residues in Protein Sequences Using SCRIBER.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Prediction of Intrinsically Disordered Lipid Binding Residues with DisoLipPred.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- qNABpredict: Quick, accurate, and taxonomy-aware sequence-based prediction of content of nucleic acid binding amino acids.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- A review of multi-omics data integration through deep learning approaches for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein sequence-based predictors of nucleic acid (NA)-binding include methods that predict NA-binding proteins and NA-binding residues. The residue-level tools produce more details but suffer high computational cost since they must predict every amino acid in the input sequence and rely on multiple sequence alignments. We propose an alternative approach that predicts content (fraction) of the NA-binding residues, offering more information than the protein-level prediction and much shorter runtime than the residue-level tools. Our first-of-its-kind content predictor, qNABpredict, relies on a small, rationally designed and fast-to-compute feature set that represents relevant characteristics extracted from the input sequence and a well-parametrized support vector regression model. We provide two versions of qNABpredict, a taxonomy-agnostic model that can be used for proteins of unknown taxonomic origin and more accurate taxonomy-aware models that are tailored to specific taxonomic kingdoms: archaea, bacteria, eukaryota, and viruses. Empirical tests on a low-similarity test dataset show that qNABpredict is 100 times faster and generates statistically more accurate content predictions when compared to the content extracted from results produced by the residue-level predictors. We also show that qNABpredict's content predictions can be used to improve results generated by the residue-level predictors. We release qNABpredict as a convenient webserver and source code at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/qNABpredict/. This new tool should be particularly useful to predict details of protein-NA interactions for large protein families and proteomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.