ArticleESC heart failure2023
Prognostic value of Growth differentiation factors 15 in Acute heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating Level of Growth-Differentiation Factor 15 and Mortality of Patients With Acute Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review.Current pharmaceutical design · 2023Pooled it
- The Role of GDF-15 in Heart Failure and Biomarker Potential-From Basic Science to Clinical Praxis.Biology · 2026Review
- The Adipokine Axis in Heart Failure: Linking Obesity, Sarcopenia and Cardiac Dysfunction in HFpEF.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Roles of GDF-15 in Acute Heart Failure: from Mechanistic Insights to Clinical Applications.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- Serum Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15) Levels Reflect Ischemic Etiology in Heart Failure Patients with Iron Deficiency: A Cross-Sectional Study.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Biomarkers in heart failure: Traditional and emerging indicators for prognosis.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Mechanisms and pharmacotherapy of cancer cachexia-associated anorexia.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025Review
- Biomarkers in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Perpetually Evolving Frontier.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Predictive Value of Combined Detection of Serum LGALS3BP and GDF-15 for the Prognosis of ICU Sepsis Patients.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Article
- Heart Failure: Is There an Ideal Biomarker?Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Prognostic value of Growth differentiation factors 15 in Acute heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThere is an increasing proportion of hospitalized heart failure (HF) patients classified as HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) around the world. Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) is a promising biomarker in HFpEF prognostication; however, the majority of the existing data has been derived from the research on undifferentiated HF, whereas the studies focusing on HFpEF are still limited. This study aimed to determine the prognostic power of GDF-15 in the hospitalized patients with HFpEF in a Chinese cohort. METHODS AND
resultsWe analysed the levels of serum GDF-15 in 380 patients hospitalized for acute onset of HFpEF measured by heart ultrasound at admission in a prospective cohort. The associations of GDF-15 with 1 year risk of all-cause death and 1 year HF readmission were assessed by the Cox proportional hazards model. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was used to compare predictive accuracy. GDF-15 was strongly correlated with 1 year HF readmission and 1 year all-cause death, with event rates of 24.8%, 40.0%, and 50.0% for 1 year HF readmission (P < 0.001), respectively, and with 11.2%, 13.6%, and 24.6% for 1 year all-cause death (P = 0.004) in the corresponding tertile, respectively. In the multivariate linear regression model, GDF-15 had a significantly negative correlation with haemoglobin (P = 0.01) and a positive correlation with creatinine (P = 0.01), alanine transaminase (P = 0.001), and therapy of aldosterone antagonist (P = 0.018). The univariate Cox regression model of GDF-15 showed that c-statistic was 0.632 for 1 year HF readmission and 0.644 for 1 year all-cause death, which were superior to the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) model with c-statistics of 0.595 and 0.610, respectively. In the multivariable Cox regression model, GDF-15 tertiles independently predicted 1 year HF readmission (hazard ratio 2.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.43-3.54, P < 0.001) after adjusting for baseline Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF) risk score, history of HF, NT-proBNP, and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Compared with the model including all the adjusted variables, the model with the addition of GDF-15 improved predictive power, with c-statistic increasing from 0.643 to 0.657 for 1 year HF readmission and from 0.638 to 0.660 for 1 year all-cause death.
conclusionsIn hospitalized patients with HFpEF, GDF-15 measured within 48 h of admission is a strong independent biomarker for 1 year HF readmission and even better than NT-proBNP. GDF-15 combined with the traditional indicators provided incremental prognostic value in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.