Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36519212›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2023

Tissue sealing versus suture ligation in open canine ovariectomy: Surgical times, intraoperative nociceptive response and frequency of complications.

Vincenzo Cicirelli, Matteo Burgio, Alice Carbonari, Giovanni M Lacalandra, Giulio G Aiudi

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincenzo CicirelliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2792-8848
Matteo BurgioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Alice CarbonariDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Giovanni M LacalandraDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Giulio G AiudiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, we compared two different techniques currently used for open canine ovariectomy: traditional method utilising absorbable suture and vessel sealing device (ENSEAL

objectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the surgical times, intraoperative nociceptive response and the frequency of intraoperative complications in the canine ovariectomy procedure using these two techniques.

methodsForty bitches were randomly divided into two groups. The Control Group (C) will use a classic open surgery approach using ligatures with absorbable suture and ovarian resection with a scalpel blade. In the Group E, resection of ovarian structures was performed with ENSEAL

resultsThe results of this study showed that the procedures performed using ENSEAL

conclusionsThe present study shows that the use of ENSEAL

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesNociceptionAnimalsDogsFemaleIntraoperative ComplicationsOperative TimeOvariectomySuturesnociceptive responseopen canine ovariectomysurgical complicationssurgical timestissue sealing

Identifiers

PMID36519212
PMCPMC9857134
OpenAlexW4311510535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.