Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36519171›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Seroprevalence of human brucellosis among the tribal and non-tribal population residing in an eastern state of India: Findings from the state-wide serosurvey.

Debaprasad Parai, Subrat Kumar Sahoo, Matrujyoti Pattnaik, Aparajita Swain, Annalisha Peter, Lopamudra Jena Samanta, Rashmita Pradhan, Hari Ram Choudhary, Kanhu Charan Nahak, Sanghamitra Pati and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genomic insights intoMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Debaprasad ParaiDepartment of Microbiology, ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, India.
Subrat Kumar SahooDepartment of Microbiology, ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, India.
Matrujyoti PattnaikDepartment of Microbiology, ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, India.
Aparajita SwainDepartment of Microbiology, ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, India.
Annalisha PeterDepartment of Microbiology, ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, India.
Lopamudra Jena SamantaDepartment of Microbiology, ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, India.
Rashmita PradhanDepartment of Microbiology, ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, India.
Hari Ram ChoudharyDepartment of Microbiology, ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, India.
Kanhu Charan NahakDepartment of Microbiology, ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sanghamitra PatiDepartment of Microbiology, ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, India.
Debdutta BhattacharyaDepartment of Microbiology, ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, India.
Regional Medical Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brucellosis is a neglected zoonotic disease found predominantly in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs), causing significant public health concern in India. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of human brucellosis in Odisha, India among community members involved in animal husbandry as a common practice. Method: This cross-sectional study included 817 adult participants from 11 districts in Odisha. Four districts from the Northern division, four districts from the Central division, and three districts from the Southern division were selected for the study. Blood samples were collected during a COVID-19 serosurvey in Odisha conducted from 1st to 17th September 2021. Immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibodies were measured against Results: The overall prevalence of anti-Brucella IgG antibodies was calculated at 16.65% (95% CI: 14.19-19.42). The highest seropositivity was found in Sambalpur district (29.73%; 95% CI: 16.43-47.16) and the lowest was determined in Mayurbhanj district (4.44%; 95% CI: 0.99-15.60). Compared to males, females were more prone to contracting the disease (AOR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.05-1.67). Participants from rural settings had higher prevalence of anti-Brucella IgG antibodies than urban dwellers (AOR: 4.53; 95% CI: 1.73-11.86). Conclusion: This study revealed that human brucellosis was associated with sociodemographic factors like gender, living settings, and household numbers. To prevent brucellosis, screening should be initiated, infected humans should be treated early, and the public should be educated about risk factors and preventive measures.

Indexed as

brucellosisELISAIgG antibodyOdishaseroprevalence

Identifiers

PMID36519171
PMCPMC9742238
OpenAlexW4310267012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.