ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022
Adoption and Trends in Uptake of Updated ICD-10 Codes for
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Twenty-Five-Year Trends in Mortality Associated withMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Underutilization of syndrome-specific ICD-10 codes for genetic epilepsies: Implications for precision medicine.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Use of electronic health record data to identify hospital-associatedmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In October 2017, the single International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), code for Methods: To evaluate and validate use of the updated codes, this retrospective study included inpatient encounters with a CDI-related ICD-10 code from October 2016 to May 2019 in the PINC AI Results: Widespread adoption of the updated CDI codes across PHD hospitals occurred in October 2017. After October 2017, 21 446 CDI-related encounters met sample selection criteria (concordance in 67% of rCDI and 25% of nrCDI encounters). Higher proportions of rCDI- vs nrCDI-coded encounters ( Conclusions: Our study findings suggest no delay in transition to the updated CDI-related codes. Treatment patterns for rCDI vs nrCDI encounters were consistent with Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines, regardless of concordance status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.