Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36519085›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2022

Processing affects (decreases or increases) metabolites, flavonoids, black rice pigment, and total antioxidant capacity of purple glutinous rice grains.

Jinyan Zhu, Qiang Shi, Changhui Sun, Jinlong Hu, Nianbing Zhou, Haiyan Wei, Haohua He, Dahu Zhou, Hongcheng Zhang, Qiangqiang Xiong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinyan ZhuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Qiang ShiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Changhui SunJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Jinlong HuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Nianbing ZhouJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Haiyan WeiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Haohua HeCollege of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China.
Dahu ZhouCollege of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China.
Hongcheng ZhangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Qiangqiang XiongJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Yangzhou University · CNJiangxi Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to understand the effects of processing on metabolites, flavonoids, black rice pigments and total antioxidant capacity of purple grains. The biochemical indicators and metabolites were determined before and after processing of purple grains. The results showed that the total antioxidant capacity, total phenol (TP), flavonoid (PD), oligomeric proanthocyanidin (OPC), ascorbic acid (AsA), cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3OG), peonidin 3-glucoside (P3G) contents of purple grains were greatly decreased after brown rice grains were processed into polished rice grains. The TP, PD, OPC, AsA, C3OG, and P3G of Yangzinuo No.1 brown rice (YZN1_B) or polished rice grains (YZN1_H) were higher than those of Yangzinuo No.2 brown rice (YZN2_B) or polished rice grains (YZN2_H). 154 differential metabolites (DMs) were identified between YZN1_B and YZN1_H. 52 DMs were identified between YZN2_B and YZN2_H. Citric acid and isocyanate are key metabolites affected during processing and have good correlations with various biochemical indicators.

Indexed as

Black rice pigmentFlavonoidsMetabolomicPurple riceTotal antioxidant capacity

Identifiers

PMID36519085
PMCPMC9743149
OpenAlexW4308456572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.