Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36519072›Full record

ArticleNational science review2022

Unimodal productivity-biodiversity relationship along the gradient of multidimensional resources across Chinese grasslands.

Yanfen Wang, Jianqing Du, Zhe Pang, Yali Liu, Kai Xue, Yann Hautier, Biao Zhang, Li Tang, Lili Jiang, Baoming Ji and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Resource diversity disturbs marineEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  5. Saccharomycotina yeasts defy long-standing macroecological patterns.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Yanfen WangCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100049, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5666-9289
Jianqing DuCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100049, China.
Zhe PangCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100049, China.
Yali LiuSchool of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing100083, China.
Kai XueCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100049, China.
Yann HautierEcology and Biodiversity Group, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht3584CH, The Netherlands.
Biao ZhangCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100049, China.
Li TangCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100049, China.
Lili JiangState Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100101, China.
Baoming JiSchool of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing100083, China.
Xingliang XuKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100101, China.
Jing ZhangSchool of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing100083, China.
Ronghai HuCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100049, China.
Shutong ZhouCollege of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100049, China.
Fang WangCollege of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100049, China.
Rongxiao CheSchool of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming650091, China.
Di WangInstitute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100101, China.
Chaoting ZhouDepartment of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Xiaoyong CuiBeijing Yanshan Earth Critical Zone National Research Station, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing101408, China.
Nico EisenhauerGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Leipzig04103, Germany.
Yanbin HaoBeijing Yanshan Earth Critical Zone National Research Station, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing101408, China.

Funding

European Research Council 677232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resources can affect plant productivity and biodiversity simultaneously and thus are key drivers of their relationships in addition to plant-plant interactions. However, most previous studies only focused on a single resource while neglecting the nature of resource multidimensionality. Here we integrated four essential resources for plant growth into a single metric of resource diversity (RD) to investigate its effects on the productivity-biodiversity relationship (PBR) across Chinese grasslands. Results showed that habitats differing in RD have different PBRs-positive in low-resource habitats, but neutral in medium- and high-resource ones-while collectively, a weak positive PBR was observed. However, when excluding direct effects of RD on productivity and biodiversity, the PBR in high-resource habitats became negative, which leads to a unimodal instead of a positive PBR along the RD gradient. By integrating resource effects and changing plant-plant interactions into a unified framework with the RD gradient, our work contributes to uncovering underlying mechanisms for inconsistent PBRs at large scales.

Indexed as

grasslandplant strategiesproductivity–biodiversity relationshipresource diversity

Identifiers

PMID36519072
PMCPMC9743175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.