ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2022
Multi-omics consensus portfolio to refine the classification of lung adenocarcinoma with prognostic stratification, tumor microenvironment, and unique sensitivity to first-line therapies.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhibitor of DNA binding 1 in lung cancer and the tumor microenvironment: a testable hypothesis for malignant pleural effusion formation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Multi-omics and Mendelian randomization identifyTranslational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Multi-omics based consensus subtypes, development of prognostic signature, and identification of INHBB as a potential therapeutic target in colorectal cancer.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- CALU promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression by enhancing cell proliferation, migration and invasion.Respiratory research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Molecular classification of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) based on transcriptomic features has been widely studied. The complementarity of data obtained from multilayer molecular biology could help the LUAD classification via combining multi-omics information. Methods: We successfully divided samples from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (n=437) into four subtypes (CS1, CS2, CS3 and CS4) by 10 comprehensive multi-omics clustering methods in the "movics" R package. Meanwhile, external validation sets from different sequencing technologies proved the robustness of the grouping model. The relationship between subtypes, prognosis, molecular features, tumor microenvironment and response to first-line therapy was further analyzed. Next we used univariate Cox regression analysis and Lasso regression analysis to explore the application of biomarkers in clinical prognosis and constructed a prognostic model. Results: CS1 showed the worst overall survival (OS) among all four clusters, possibly related to its poor immune infiltration, higher tumor mutation and worse chromosomal stability. Patients in different subtypes differed significantly in cancer stem cell characteristics, activation of cancer-related pathways, sensitivity to chemotherapy and immunotherapy. The prognostic model showed good predictive performance. The 1-, 2- and 3-year areas under the curve of risk score were 0.779, 0.742 and 0.678, respectively. Seven genes ( Conclusions: Four LUAD subtypes with different molecular characteristics and clinical implications were identified successfully through bioinformatic analysis. Our results may contribute to precision medicine and inform the development of rational clinical strategies for targeted and immune therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.