ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2022
Development and validation of the artificial intelligence (AI)-based diagnostic model for bronchial lumen identification.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in bronchoscopy: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-based image recognition in bronchoscopy: software development and randomized controlled trial for training evaluation in intensive care residents.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Artificial intelligence and digital health in bronchoscopy: advances in diagnostic accuracy, real-time navigation and procedural skills training.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Endoscopy: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Opportunities for Interventional Radiology in Transbronchial Interventions.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Review
- Comparing artificial intelligence and healthcare professional performance in surgical and interventional video analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- An accurate prediction for respiratory diseases using deep learning on bronchoscopy diagnosis images.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- Review
- Enhanced object detection in pediatric bronchoscopy images using YOLO-based algorithms with CBAM attention mechanism.Heliyon · 2024Article
- On the Horizon: Specific Applications of Automation and Artificial Intelligence in Anesthesiology.Current anesthesiology reports · 2023Article
- A combination of flexible and rigid bronchoscopy in the successful removal of a residual fish bone from a peripheral bronchus: A case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Distinguishing bronchoscopically observed anatomical positions of airway under by convolutional neural network.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Pulmonology.Therapeutic advances in pulmonary and critical care medicineReview
- Building and validating an artificial intelligence model to identify tracheobronchopathia osteochondroplastica by using bronchoscopic images.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bronchoscopy is a key step in the diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases. However, the level of expertise varies among different bronchoscopists. Artificial intelligence (AI) may help them identify bronchial lumens. Thus, a bronchoscopy quality-control system based on AI was built to improve the performance of bronchoscopists. Methods: This single-center observational study consecutively collected bronchoscopy videos from Shanghai Chest Hospital and segmented each video into 31 different anatomical locations to develop an AI-assisted system based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) model. We then designed a single-center trial to compare the accuracy of lumen recognition by bronchoscopists with and without the assistance of the AI system. Results: A total of 28,441 qualified images of bronchial lumen were used to train the CNNs. In the cross-validation set, the optimal accuracy of the six models was between 91.83% and 96.62%. In the test set, the visual geometry group 16 (VGG-16) achieved optimal performance with an accuracy of 91.88%, and an area under the curve of 0.995. In the clinical evaluation, the accuracy rate of the AI system alone was 54.30% (202/372). For the identification of bronchi except for segmental bronchi, the accuracy was 82.69% (129/156). In group 1, the recognition accuracy rates of doctors A, B, a and b alone were 42.47%, 34.68%, 28.76%, and 29.57%, respectively, but increased to 57.53%, 54.57%, 54.57%, and 46.24% respectively when combined with the AI system. Similarly, in group 2, the recognition accuracy rates of doctors C, D, c, and d were 37.90%, 41.40%, 30.91%, and 33.60% respectively, but increased to 51.61%, 47.85%, 53.49%, and 54.30% respectively, when combined with the AI system. Except for doctor D, the accuracy of doctors in recognizing lumen was significantly higher with AI assistance than without AI assistance, regardless of their experience (P<0.001). Conclusions: Our AI system could better recognize bronchial lumen and reduce differences in the operation levels of different bronchoscopists. It could be used to improve the quality of everyday bronchoscopies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.