ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022
The Therapeutic Effects of
Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Nigella Sativa's medicinal capacity against skin cancer pathways using network pharmacology and molecular docking.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Role ofBiomedical reports · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial Properties and Therapeutic Potential of Bioactive Compounds inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Evolution of radiation-induced dermatitis treatment.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024Review
- Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Natural Compounds in Psoriasis and Their Inclusion in Nanotechnological Systems.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Nano-based formulations of thymoquinone are new approaches for psoriasis treatment: a literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- How Thymoquinone fromCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to identify randomized controlled trials that looked at the effects of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.