Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36518802›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2022

The expression of androgen receptor in triple-negative breast cancer and the effect of a traditional Chinese medicine formula on disease-free survival.

Linghong Yu, Qinghong Yu, Chuchu Xu, Mengqian Wang, Jiaqing Song, Xiufei Gao

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linghong YuZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Qinghong YuZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Chuchu XuZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Mengqian WangZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Jiaqing SongZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiufei GaoBreast Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Androgen receptor (AR) is becoming an important factor in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is widely used in treating breast cancer patients. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer, which has worse prognosis than other subtypes. Herein, through this retrospective study, we summarize the therapeutic implications of AR and TCM in TNBC. Methods: The clinical and pathological data of TNBC patients who had undergone surgery at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University from 2017 to 2019 were collected and examined. The Results: We identified 823 early breast cancer patients from January 2017 to December 2019, of whom 92 (11.2%) were pathologically confirmed to have TNBC. We excluded 5 patients according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In relation to the remaining 87 patients, 33 (37.9%) were AR positive. In the TNBC patients, positive AR expression was correlated with an older age (P=0.006), a higher weight (P=0.006), and lower Ki-67 expression (P=0.031). After a median follow-up time of 37 months (range, 24-60 months), 13 cases of relapse and metastasis (14.9%) were observed. We found that relapse and metastasis were correlated with being unmarried [P=0.004; hazard ratio (HR) =0.105; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.023-0.487], nonporous (P=0.046; HR =0.209; 95% CI: 0.045-0.971), and negative AR expression (P=0.042; HR =1.223; 95% CI: 0.049-1.012). The AR-positive TNBC patients had better disease-free survival (DFS) than the AR-negative TNBC patients 2-5 years after surgery (P<0.05). TCM was an effective treatment for TNBC (P<0.001; HR =51.682; 95% CI: 6.660-401.025). In the AR-negative group, patients who received the TCM treatment tended to have a better DFS than those who did not receive the TCM treatment (P<0.001; HR =34.832; 95% CI: 4.448-272.756); however, no such difference was found in the AR-positive group. Conclusions: The TNBC patients with positive AR tended to have a low expression of Ki-67 and a better prognosis than AR negative TNBC patients. TCM is an effective treatment and has slight side effects.

Indexed as

Androgen receptor (AR)disease-free survival (DFS)prognosistraditional Chinese medicine (TCM)triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)

Identifiers

PMID36518802
PMCPMC9742057
OpenAlexW4309908795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.