ArticleGland surgery2022
A case series study of lacrimal canalicular laceration repair with the bi-canalicular stent.
Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lacrimal Drainage Catheter Coated with Mitomycin C to Inhibit Fibrosis after Canalicular Laceration Repair.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Traumatic Eyelid Laceration Repairs by Ophthalmology Residents Performed in the Emergency Department.Cureus · 2026Article
- Characteristics and outcomes of electric bicycle-related canalicular lacerations in a tertiary hospital in North China.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Article
- Dacryocystitis and canaliculitis secondary to residual of epidural catheter remaining in lacrimal duct for 25 years: a case report and literature review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Canalicular lacerations: Techniques used and timing to intervene.Oman journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lacrimal canalicular laceration can be caused by trauma on the ocular adnexa, such as penetrating or blunt injuries, accounting for approximately 16% of eyelid lacerations and 20% of eye traumas. Historically, canalicular anastomosis combined with bi-canalicular or mono-canalicular stent intubation has been used for canalicular laceration repair. In this study, we analyzed the epidemiological characteristics of lacrimal canalicular laceration and evaluate the clinical outcomes of repair using the bi-canalicular stent in central China. It aims to provide a reference for clinical work. Methods: This is a review of 338 patients (338 eyes) with eyelid lacrimal canaliculus laceration undergoing reparative bi-canalicular stent intubation from January 1 Results: The average age was 39.6±20.0 years (1 to 88 years). Of all the 338 patients, 254 (75.15%) patients were men. Upper and lower canalicular lacerations were seen in 68 (20.12%) and 256 (75.74%) patients, respectively. Also, 14 patients (4.14%) presented with both upper and lower canalicular lacerations. Most injuries occurred on the streets (146, 43.20%), followed by the home in 111 (32.84%) patients. Traffic accidents were the leading cause of injury (127, 37.57%), including 72 (21.30%) cases of electric bike-associated accidents, followed by fall-related trauma in 65 (19.23%) cases. During the follow-up, there were 6 (1.78%) patients with eyelid ectropion and 9 (2.66%) patients with stent extrusion and loss due to eye rubbing and pulling the sutures out. At the end of follow-up, the anatomical success rate was 95.86% and the functional success rate was 89.64%. Conclusions: Electric bike-associated accidents occurring on the streets is the current leading cause of injury in central China. Lacrimal canalicular laceration repair with a bi-canalicular stent offers an effective surgical therapeutic strategy for traumatic canalicular lacerations. In addition, avoiding traffic accidents is also one way prevent lacrimal canalicular laceration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.