Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36518695›Full record

ArticleACS medicinal chemistry letters2022

Fragment-Sized Thiazoles in Fragment-Based Drug Discovery Campaigns: Friend or Foe?

Matic Proj, Martina Hrast, Damijan Knez, Krištof Bozovičar, Katarina Grabrijan, Anže Meden, Stanislav Gobec, Rok Frlan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matic ProjFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4043-9686
Martina HrastFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0488-2445
Damijan KnezFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9917-1384
Krištof BozovičarFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Katarina GrabrijanFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Anže MedenFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3594-6579
Stanislav GobecFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9678-3083
Rok FrlanFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0956-5537

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thiazoles exhibit a wide range of biological activities and therefore represent useful and attractive building blocks. To evaluate their usefulness and pinpoint their liabilities in fragment screening campaigns, we assembled a focused library of 49 fragment-sized thiazoles and thiadiazoles with various substituents, namely amines, bromides, carboxylic acids, and nitriles. The library was profiled in a cascade of biochemical inhibition assays, redox activity, thiol reactivity, and stability assays. Our study indicates that when thiazole derivatives are identified as screening hits, their reactivity should be carefully addressed and correlated with specific on-target engagement. Importantly, nonspecific inhibition should be excluded using experimental approaches and

Identifiers

PMID36518695
PMCPMC9743419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.