Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36518563›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2022

Barriers and facilitators for the sustainability of digital health interventions in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Soutongnoma Safiata Kaboré, Patrice Ngangue, Dieudonné Soubeiga, Abibata Barro, Arzouma Hermann Pilabré, Nestor Bationo, Yacouba Pafadnam, Koiné Maxime Drabo, Hervé Hien, Gueswendé Blaise Léon Savadogo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
38.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Role of telemedicine in cardiovascular care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Soutongnoma Safiata KaboréCentre D'excellence Africain, Université Nazi BONI, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Patrice NgangueDépartement des Sciences Infirmières et Obstétricales, Institut de Formation et de Recherche Interdisciplinaires en Sciences de la Santé et de L'Éducation, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Dieudonné SoubeigaDépartement des Sciences Infirmières et Obstétricales, Institut de Formation et de Recherche Interdisciplinaires en Sciences de la Santé et de L'Éducation, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Abibata BarroDépartement des Sciences Infirmières et Obstétricales, Institut de Formation et de Recherche Interdisciplinaires en Sciences de la Santé et de L'Éducation, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Arzouma Hermann PilabréDépartement des Sciences Infirmières et Obstétricales, Institut de Formation et de Recherche Interdisciplinaires en Sciences de la Santé et de L'Éducation, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Nestor BationoDépartement des Sciences Infirmières et Obstétricales, Institut de Formation et de Recherche Interdisciplinaires en Sciences de la Santé et de L'Éducation, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Yacouba PafadnamDépartement des Sciences Infirmières et Obstétricales, Institut de Formation et de Recherche Interdisciplinaires en Sciences de la Santé et de L'Éducation, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Koiné Maxime DraboInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Centre National Pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Hervé HienDirection Générale, Institut National de Santé Publique, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Gueswendé Blaise Léon SavadogoCentre D'excellence Africain, Université Nazi BONI, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique · BFDirection Générale de la Pharmacie, du Médicament et des Laboratoires · BFNazi Boni University · BFUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue · CAUniversité Joseph Ki-Zerbo · BF

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital health interventions (DHIs) have increased exponentially all over the world. Furthermore, the interest in the sustainability of digital health interventions is growing significantly. However, a systematic synthesis of digital health intervention sustainability challenges is lacking. This systematic review aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators for the sustainability of digital health intervention in low and middle-income countries. Methods: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase and Web of Science) were searched. Two independent reviewers selected eligible publications based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted and quality assessed by four team members. Qualitative, quantitative or mixed studies conducted in low and middle-income countries and published from January 2000 to May 2022 were included. Results: The sustainability of digital health interventions is very complex and multidimensional. Successful sustainability of digital health interventions depends on interdependent complex factors that influence the implementation and scale-up level in the short, middle and long term. Barriers identified among others are associated with infrastructure, equipment, internet, electricity and the DHIs. As for the facilitators, they are more focused on the strong commitment and involvement of relevant stakeholders: Government, institutional, sectoral, stakeholders' support, collaborative networks with implementing partners, improved satisfaction, convenience, privacy, confidentiality and trust in clients, experience and confidence in using the system, motivation and competence of staff. All stakeholders play an essential role in the process of sustainability. Digital technology can have long term impacts on health workers, patients, and the health system, by improving data management for decision-making, the standard of healthcare service delivery and boosting attendance at health facilities and using services. Therefore, management changes with effective monitoring and evaluation before, during, and after DHIs are essential. Conclusion: The sustainability of digital health interventions is crucial to maintain good quality healthcare, especially in low and middle-income countries. Considering potential barriers and facilitators for the sustainability of digital health interventions should inform all stakeholders, from their planning until their scaling up. Besides, it would be appropriate at the health facilities level to consolidate facilitators and efficiently manage barriers with the participation of all stakeholders.

Indexed as

barrierseHealthfacilitatorshealth systemslow and middle-income countriesmHealthsustainabilitysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36518563
PMCPMC9742266
OpenAlexW4310266395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.