Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36518473›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2022

Jacqueline Miller-Holt, Irene Baskerville-Abraham, Masanori Sakimura, Toshiro Fukushima, Andrea Puglisi, Jeremie Gafner

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. A perspective review on factors that influence mutagenicity in medicinal plants and their health implications.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
  7. The Potential Impact of Oral Nicotine Pouches on Public Health: A Scoping Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in toxicology · 2024
    Article
  11. Classification, Perception, and Toxicity of Emerging Flavored Oral Nicotine Pouches.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacqueline Miller-HoltScientific and Regulatory Affairs, JT International SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
Irene Baskerville-AbrahamScientific and Regulatory Affairs, JT International SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
Masanori SakimuraScientific and Regulatory Affairs, JT International SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
Toshiro FukushimaScientific Product Assessment Center, R&D Group, Japan Tobacco Inc., Kanagawa, Japan.
Andrea PuglisiScientific and Regulatory Affairs, JT International SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jeremie GafnerScientific and Regulatory Affairs, JT International SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
Japan Tobacco (Switzerland) · CHJapan Tobacco (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-clinical in vitro studies were conducted to investigate the characteristics of extracts from tobacco free nicotine pouches alongside a reference snus product and/or 1R6F reference cigarette.

Indexed as

3D tissueAmesCytotoxicityEpiGingival™In vitroMicronucleusNicotine pouchSmokeless

Identifiers

PMID36518473
PMCPMC9742906
OpenAlexW4282968888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.