ArticleToxicology reports2022
Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes of acute propanil poisoning in a 7-year retrospective cohort study.
Article in Toxicology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Inclusions of Pesticides by β-Cyclodextrin in Solution and Solid State: Chlorpropham, Monuron, and Propanil.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study was a 7-year retrospective cohort study (2012-2018) of patients treated for acute propanil poisoning by ingestion, using data from Ramathibodi Poison Center, Thailand. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment, outcomes and factors associated with moderate to severe outcomes and death following acute exposure to propanil. The effect of administering multiple-dose activated charcoal (MDAC) on clinical outcomes was also evaluated. A total of 275 cases were included. The results show that two thirds of patients were male and mean age was 40 years. Patients ingested either propanil or a mixture of propanil and other herbicides. The majority (98%) of exposures was intentional. Most patients (65.5%) presented with gastrointestinal symptoms. Methemoglobinemia and hemolysis were observed in 108 patients (39.3%) and 25 patients (9.1%), respectively. Median time to onset of methemoglobinemia and hemolysis after propanil ingestion was 5.5 and 48 h, respectively. One hundred and forty-one patients (51.3%) were treated with MDAC, and some patients received methylene blue (21.5%), intubation (18.5%), or blood transfusions (8%). All patients were admitted to hospitals. The median length of hospital stay of patients who survived was 3 days. Multivariate analysis indicated that neurological symptoms at presentation, methemoglobinemia and acute kidney injury during admission, were associated with moderate to severe outcomes. Factors associated with mortality were older age, larger amount of ingestion, neurological symptoms at presentation and hypotension during admission. The overall mortality rate was 6.2%. The mortality rate was 3.6% in patients that received MDAC and 9% in patients that did not, although the difference was not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis of patients who developed methemoglobinemia or both methemoglobinemia and hemolysis found a statistically significant lower mortality rate in patients that received MDAC. In conclusion, methemoglobinemia and hemolysis contribute to poor outcomes in acute propanil poisoning. Age, amount of ingestion, neurological symptoms at presentation and hypotension during admission could prognosticate deaths, and patients with these factors should be closely observed and aggressively managed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.