Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36518351›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Methodological heterogeneity biases physical activity metrics derived from the Actigraph GT3X in multiple sclerosis: A rapid review and comparative study.

Ashley Polhemus, Christina Haag, Chloé Sieber, Ramona Sylvester, Jan Kool, Roman Gonzenbach, Viktor von Wyl

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06676618 (Effect of Multimodal Exercise Training on Disease Activity and Functional Status in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06676618 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Multimodal Exercise Training on Disease Activity and Functional Status in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2025 to 2028Enrolled40ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsMultimodal Exercise Training, Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Sensors in Multiple Sclerosis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  4. MS Pattern Explorer: interactive visual exploration of temporal activity patterns for multiple sclerosis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashley PolhemusEpidemiology and Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Christina HaagEpidemiology and Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Chloé SieberEpidemiology and Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Ramona SylvesterResearch Department Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Centre, Valens, Switzerland.
Jan KoolResearch Department Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Centre, Valens, Switzerland.
Roman GonzenbachResearch Department Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Centre, Valens, Switzerland.
Viktor von WylEpidemiology and Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) is reduced in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), though it is known to aid in symptom and fatigue management. Methods for measuring PA are diverse and the impact of this heterogeneity on study outcomes is unclear. We aimed to clarify this impact by comparing common methods for deriving PA metrics in MS populations. Methods: First, a rapid review of existing literature identified methods for calculating PA in studies which used the Actigraph GT3X in populations with MS. We then compared methods in a prospective study on 42 persons with MS [EDSS 4.5 (3.5-6)] during a voluntary course of inpatient neurorehabilitation. Mixed-effects linear regression identified methodological factors which influenced PA measurements. Non-parametric hypothesis tests, correlations, and agreement statistics assessed overall and pairwise differences between methods. Results: In the rapid review, searches identified 421 unique records. Sixty-nine records representing 51 eligible studies exhibited substantial heterogeneity in methodology and reporting practices. In a subsequent comparative study, multiple methods for deriving six PA metrics (step count, activity counts, total time in PA, sedentary time, time in light PA, time in moderate to vigorous PA), were identified and directly compared. All metrics were sensitive to methodological factors such as the selected preprocessing filter, data source (vertical vs. vector magnitude counts), and cutpoint. Additionally, sedentary time was sensitive to wear time definitions. Pairwise correlation and agreement between methods varied from weak (minimum correlation: 0.15, minimum agreement: 0.03) to perfect (maximum correlation: 1.00, maximum agreement: 1.00). Methodological factors biased both point estimates of PA and correlations between PA and clinical assessments. Conclusions: Methodological heterogeneity of existing literature is high, and this heterogeneity may confound studies which use the Actigraph GT3X. Step counts were highly sensitive to the filter used to process raw accelerometer data. Sedentary time was particularly sensitive to methodology, and we recommend using total time in PA instead. Several, though not all, methods for deriving light PA and moderate to vigorous PA yielded nearly identical results. PA metrics based on vertical axis counts tended to outperform those based on vector magnitude counts. Additional research is needed to establish the relative validity of existing methods.

Indexed as

actigraphmethodologymultiple sclerosisphysical activitystep count

Identifiers

PMID36518351
PMCPMC9742246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.