Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36518342›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in neurobiology2022

Understanding them to understand ourselves: The importance of NHP research for translational neuroscience.

Annabella Lear, Stuart N Baker, Hannah F Clarke, Angela C Roberts, Michael C Schmid, Wendy Jarrett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in neurobiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Focused ultrasound expands intra-CSF AAV delivery to deep brain regions in rats and non-human primates.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Imaging-based chemogenetics for dissecting neural circuits in nonhuman primates.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Annabella LearUnderstanding Animal Research, Abbey House, 74-76 St John Street, London, EC1M 4DZ, United Kingdom.
Stuart N BakerMedical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
Hannah F ClarkeDepartment of Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, CB2 3DY, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Angela C RobertsDepartment of Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, CB2 3DY, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Michael C SchmidDepartment of Neuroscience and Movement Science, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Wendy JarrettUnderstanding Animal Research, Abbey House, 74-76 St John Street, London, EC1M 4DZ, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Fribourg · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T033967/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying higher brain function presents fundamental scientific challenges but has great potential for impactful translation to the clinic, supporting the needs of many patients suffering from conditions that relate to neuronal dysfunction. For many key questions relevant to human neurological conditions and clinical interventions, non-human primates (NHPs) remain the only suitable model organism and the only effective way to study the relationship between brain structure and function with the knowledge and tools currently available. Here we present three exemplary studies of current research yielding important findings that are directly translational to human clinical patients but which would be impossible without NHP studies. Our first example shows how studies of the NHP prefrontal cortex are leading to clinically relevant advances and potential new treatments for human neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression and anxiety. Our second example looks at the relevance of NHP research to our understanding of visual pathways and the visual cortex, leading to visual prostheses that offer treatments for otherwise blind patients. Finally, we consider recent advances in treatments leading to improved recovery of movement and motor control in stroke patients, resulting from our improved understanding of brain stem parallel pathways involved in movement in NHPs. The case for using NHPs in neuroscience research, and the direct benefits to human patients, is strong but has rarely been set out directly. This paper reviews three very different areas of neuroscience research, expressly highlighting the unique insights offered to each by NHP studies and their direct applicability to human clinical conditions.

Indexed as

Animal modelsMovement recoveryNon-human primatePrefrontal cortexTranslational neuroscienceVisual prostheses

Identifiers

PMID36518342
PMCPMC9743051
OpenAlexW4292343594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.