Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36518337›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in neurobiology2022

Visual modulation of firing and spectrotemporal receptive fields in mouse auditory cortex.

James Bigelow, Ryan J Morrill, Timothy Olsen, Andrea R Hasenstaub

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in neurobiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Survey of Hippocampal Responses to Sound in Naive Mice Reveals Widespread Activation by Broadband Noise Onsets.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Offset Responses in the Auditory Cortex Show Unique History Dependence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James BigelowColeman Memorial Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Ryan J MorrillColeman Memorial Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Timothy OlsenColeman Memorial Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Andrea R HasenstaubColeman Memorial Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Dynamic regulation of auditory context processing by cortical inhibitionR01DC014101 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HASENSTAUB, ANDREA RAYNE · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Cortical circuitry supporting flexible audiovisual interactions and behaviorsRF1NS116598 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HASENSTAUB, ANDREA RAYNE · 2020 to 2022
$1.8M
Cortical circuitry supporting flexible audiovisual interactions and behaviorsR01NS116598 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HASENSTAUB, ANDREA RAYNE · 2023 to 2024
$1.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014101NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116598NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS116598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have established significant anatomical and functional connections between visual areas and primary auditory cortex (A1), which may be important for cognitive processes such as communication and spatial perception. These studies have raised two important questions: First, which cell populations in A1 respond to visual input and/or are influenced by visual context? Second, which aspects of sound encoding are affected by visual context? To address these questions, we recorded single-unit activity across cortical layers in awake mice during exposure to auditory and visual stimuli. Neurons responsive to visual stimuli were most prevalent in the deep cortical layers and included both excitatory and inhibitory cells. The overwhelming majority of these neurons also responded to sound, indicating unimodal visual neurons are rare in A1. Other neurons for which sound-evoked responses were modulated by visual context were similarly excitatory or inhibitory but more evenly distributed across cortical layers. These modulatory influences almost exclusively affected sustained sound-evoked firing rate (FR) responses or spectrotemporal receptive fields (STRFs); transient FR changes at stimulus onset were rarely modified by visual context. Neuron populations with visually modulated STRFs and sustained FR responses were mostly non-overlapping, suggesting spectrotemporal feature selectivity and overall excitability may be differentially sensitive to visual context. The effects of visual modulation were heterogeneous, increasing and decreasing STRF gain in roughly equal proportions of neurons. Our results indicate visual influences are surprisingly common and diversely expressed throughout layers and cell types in A1, affecting nearly one in five neurons overall.

Identifiers

PMID36518337
PMCPMC9743056
OpenAlexW4280562416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.