ArticlePeerJ2022
Genome-wide identification and characterization of
Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Haplotype-resolved genome assembly of 'Manhattan' perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and characterization of drought responsive late embryogenesis abundant genes.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Leveraging Transcriptome Insights andPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Structure and Functions of NDR1/HIN1-Like (NHL) Proteins in Plant Development and Response to Environmental Stresses.Plant, cell & environment · 2025Review
- Study on physiological changes and response mechanism ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Genome-wide identification of NDR1/HIN1-like genes in kiwifruit and function analysis of AeNHL17 in response to disease resistance.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Cloning of the SoybeanPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Deciphering the roles of unknown/uncharacterized genes in plant development and stress responses.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: We identified the potential Results: In this study, we identified 59 potential
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.