Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36518277›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Adult intussusception: a challenge to laparoscopic surgery?

Mingze Sun, Zhongmin Li, Zhenbo Shu, Qi Wu, Xue Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Malignancy risk and management outcomes in adult intussusception: a single-institution retrospective study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mingze SunDepartment of General Surgery, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhongmin LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Colorectal and Anal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Zhenbo ShuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Colorectal and Anal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Qi WuDepartment of General Surgery, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xue LiuObstetrics and Gynacology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7663-6281
Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province · CNJilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intussusception can occur at any age and is common in children but less common in adults. This study aimed to evaluate our experience of 51 adult intussusception and study the etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment. Methods: This analysis assessed the clinical manifestations, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of adult intussusception in 51 adult patients at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University from January 2010 to December 2020. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 54.43 ± 18.21 years, and 42 patients were diagnosed by abdominal ultrasonography and abdominal computed tomography (CT). Among them, 76.5% (39/51) had abdominal pain, 11.8% (6/51) had blood in stool, and 5.9% (3/51) had a palpable abdominal mass. Of these, 62.7% had tumors: malignant accounted for 39.2% (20/51) and benign accounted for 23.5% (12/51). CT is the preferred imaging method with a sensitivity of 92.2%, while colonoscopy provides a complementary diagnosis in patients involving the colon. All patients underwent surgical treatment, including 21.6% (11/51) laparoscopic surgery, 74.5% (38/51) open surgery, and 5.9% (3/51) intussusception reduction during the operation. The average operation time of the open group was 133.27 ± 43.75 min and the average hospital stay was 16.24 ± 12.55 days, while the average operation time of the laparoscopic group was 140.50 ± 46.15 mins, and the average hospital stay was 16.60 ± 16.98 days ( Conclusion: Adult intussusception is a rare disease in clinic. Laparoscopic surgery can be useful and safe for adult intussusception.

Indexed as

IntussusceptionLaparoscopyAbdominal PainAdultAgedChildColonColonoscopyHumansMiddle AgedAdult intussusceptionComputed tomography (CT)Laparoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36518277
PMCPMC9744142
OpenAlexW4311001931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.