Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36518268›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Assessing future shifts in habitat suitability and connectivity to old-growth forests to support the conservation of the endangered giant noctule.

Mattia Iannella, Urbana Masciulli, Francesco Cerasoli, Michele Di Musciano, Maurizio Biondi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Roosting behaviour of greater noctule bats (Royal Society open science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mattia IannellaDepartment of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4695-0194
Urbana MasciulliDepartment of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Francesco CerasoliDepartment of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9712-9147
Michele Di MuscianoDepartment of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Maurizio BiondiDepartment of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
University of L'Aquila · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Suitable climate and availability of habitats for roosting, foraging, and dispersing are critical for the long-term persistence of bat species. The giant noctule ( Methodology: We integrated climate-based ecological niche models with information about topography and rivers' network to model weighted suitability for Results: Current weighted suitability is highest in Andalusia, northern Iberia, southwestern France, peninsular Italy, coastal Balkans and Anatolia, with dispersed suitable patches elsewhere. A north-eastward shift of weighted suitability emerges in the considered future scenarios, especially under SSP 5.85. The major current ecological corridors for Conclusions: The outcomes of our analyses would help in designing specific conservation measures for the distinct groups of giant noctule populations, favoring the possibility of range expansion and movement towards forested habitats.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemBalkan PeninsulaForestsFranceClimate changeEcological niche modelsGiant noctuleLandscape connectivityNiche overlapOld-growth forests

Identifiers

PMID36518268
PMCPMC9744155
OpenAlexW4310232730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.