ArticleJournal of clinical and translational research2022
Coronal T2-weighted imaging improves the measurement accuracy of the subarachnoid space in infants: A descriptive study.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The subarachnoid space width (SASw) is part of crucial neuroimaging criteria for the diagnosis of subarachnoid space enlargement in infants. In addition to indicating the presence of these diseases, SASw can be used to assess their severity. Therefore, it is important to be able to measure the SASw accurately. Aim: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of measurements made from axial and coronal T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and to establish a consentaneous measurement scheme of SASw in infants. Methods: A total of 63 infants (31 males and 32 females) aged 4 days to 24 months were enrolled in this study. The supratentorial subarachnoid space volume (SASv) and corrected SASv (cSASv) were used as the gold standard reference. The SASw (including interhemispheric width and bilateral frontal craniocortical width) was measured on axial and coronal T2WI. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and agreement of the SASw were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. A paired t-test was used to compare SASw measured on axial and coronal images. The accuracy of SASw measurements made from axial and coronal T2WI was evaluated by the relationships between the SASw and supratentorial SASv and between the SASw and supratentorial cSASv, and the relationships were examined by multivariate linear regression. Results: The intra- and inter-observer ICC values of the three SASw measurements were greater on coronal T2WI than on axial T2WI. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed that the SASw values measured on coronal T2WI had better intra- and inter-observer agreement than axial T2WI. According to the multivariate linear regression results, model 4 (the SASw measured in coronal T2WI) was the best predictor of supratentorial cSASv (R Conclusions: The SASw measured on coronal T2WI was more repeatable and accurate than axial T2WI and was more representative of the actual cerebrospinal fluid accumulation in the supratentorial subarachnoid space. Relevance for Patients: The SASw has been found to be a simple and essential substitution for supratentorial SASv, which can be measured on both axial T2WI passing through the bodies of the bilateral ventricles and coronal T2WI at the level of the foramen of Monro. The SASw measured on coronal T2WI was more beneficial to the diagnosis and severity assessment of subarachnoid space enlargement in infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36518203PMC9741930W4311824870What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.