ReviewJournal of clinical and translational research2022
Patient satisfaction with telemedicine in acute care setting: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of clinical and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explaining Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Telehealth Use with Different Levels of English Proficiency: A Decomposition Approach.Telemedicine reports · 2025Article
- Patient Preferences for Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine Services: Replication and Extension of a Nationwide Survey.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Medical dispatchers' experience with live video during emergency calls: a national questionnaire study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- The Impact of Digital Health Solutions on Bridging the Health Care Gap in Rural Areas: A Scoping Review.The Permanente journal · 2024Article
- Emergency care via video consultation: interviews on patient experiences from rural community hospitals in northern Sweden.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- The role of health-related quality of life in improving cancer outcomes.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2023Article
- Improving health literacy using the power of digital communications to achieve better health outcomes for patients and practitioners.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine has revolutionized health-care services with its unprecedented abilities to connect patients with health-care professional across the distances. Patient satisfaction is an important measure of the quality and effectiveness of health-care services. Aim: The goal of this systematic review is to investigate patient satisfaction with telemedicine in acute care setting. Methods and Results: Four sources of data were searched PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Web of Science. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis as our basis of organization. Our analysis has showed that acute telemedicine was effective in managing a broad spectrum of acute medical conditions while achieving high levels of patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Patient satisfaction is a complex product of expectations and experiences. Furthermore, it is an important indicator of the quality of the service. Despite the challenging nature of acute medicine, telemedicine services were successful in improving the quality of the service and achieving high levels of patient satisfaction. Relevance for Patients: Telemedicine is rapidly evolving as an essential component of our healthcare system. Implementing telemedicine in acute care is a relatively new concept and patient satisfaction in these settings needs to be evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36518201PMC9741928What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.