ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Feeding Pathway for Children on High Flow Nasal Cannula Decreases Time to Enteral Nutrition.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Quality Initiative to Prioritize Enteral Feeding in Bronchiolitis.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) is commonly used for children with respiratory failure, yet no standardized guidelines exist on how to initiate, escalate, and maintain enteral nutrition (EN) for these patients. EN in critically ill children is associated with decreased hospital length of stay, decreased ventilator days, and fewer acquired infections. We aimed to decrease the mean time to EN initiation by 50% after the start of HFNC in 6 months. Methods: This quality improvement project used the Model for Improvement to inform interventions. A multidisciplinary team created an EN pathway for critically ill patients on HFNC. We conducted Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles related to implementing a standardized pathway for EN on HFNC. The primary outcome was time to EN initiation once on HFNC. Secondary outcomes were time to goal caloric EN, duration of HFNC, and adverse events. Outcomes were plotted on statistical process control charts and analyzed for special cause variation between baseline and intervention periods. Results: We included 112 patients in the study. Special cause variation occurred for both primary and secondary outcomes. The mean time to EN initiation decreased from 24.6 hours to 11.7 hours (47.5%). Mean time to goal feeds decreased from 25.8 hours to 15.1 hours (58.5%). Mean HFNC duration did not show any special cause variation. There were no episodes of aspiration. Conclusion: Implementation of a standardized pathway for EN on patients receiving HFNC resulted in decreased time to initiation of EN and time to goal caloric EN with no significant increase in adverse events.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.