Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36518073›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Modification of a Method for Diagnosing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Sustained During Military Service.

Brian C J Moore, Larry E Humes, Graham Cox, David Lowe, Hedwig E Gockel

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Guidelines for Diagnosis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and Their Specificity.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian C J MooreCambridge Hearing Group, Department of Psychology, 2152University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7071-0671
Larry E HumesDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9668-3744
Graham CoxENT Department (retired), 6397Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3725-5261
David LoweENT Department, 156705James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1441-0065
Hedwig E GockelCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 2152University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Indiana University Bloomington · USJames Cook University Hospital · GBMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moore (2020) proposed a method for diagnosing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) sustained during military service, based on an analysis of the shapes of the audiograms of military personnel. The method, denoted M-NIHL, was estimated to have high sensitivity but low-to-moderate specificity. Here, a revised version of the method, denoted rM-NIHL, was developed that gave a better balance between sensitivity and specificity. A database of 285 audiograms of military noise-exposed men was created by merging two previously used databases with a new database, randomly shuffling, and then splitting into two, one for development of the revised method and one for evaluation. Two comparable databases of audiograms of 185 non-exposed men were also created, again one for development and one for evaluation. Based on the evaluation databases, the rM-NIHL method has slightly lower sensitivity than the M-NIHL method, but the specificity is markedly higher. The two methods have similar overall diagnostic performance. If an individual is classified as having NIHL based on a positive diagnosis for either ear, the rM-NIHL method has a sensitivity of 0.98 and a specificity of 0.63. Based on a positive diagnosis for both ears, the rM-NIHL method has a sensitivity of 0.76 and a specificity of 0.95.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, Noise-InducedMilitary PersonnelHearing TestsHumansMaleNoiseSensitivity and Specificitydiagnosishearing lossmilitary servicenoise exposuresensitivity and specificity

Identifiers

PMID36518073
PMCPMC9761234
OpenAlexW4312065954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.