ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022
Value of Early Laparoscopic Exploration for Primary Infertile Patients with Patent Fallopian Tubes Complicated with Pelvic Effusion.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence-based segmentation and quantitative assessment of knee cartilage in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Proposal for targeted, neo-evolutionary-oriented, secondary prevention of early-onset endometriosis and adenomyosis. Part I: pathogenic aspects.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Is retrograde menstruation a universal, recurrent, physiological phenomenon? A systematic review of the evidence in humans and non-human primates.Human reproduction open · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometriosis is a progressive disease, and early detection and early treatment are particularly important. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the timing of laparoscopy on the spontaneous pregnancy rate of primary infertile patients complicated with pelvic effusion within 6 months after surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 330 primary infertile patients with pelvic effusion and bilateral patent fallopian tubes. They were divided into 3 groups based on retrospective analysis of clinical data. Study Group 1 underwent laparoscopy 1 month after hysterosalpingography (HSG), Study Group 2 received laparoscopy after trying to conceive for 3 months, and the Control Group did not undergo laparoscopy. According to the specific conditions during laparoscopy, repair and plastic surgery of fallopian tube, electrocautery of endometriosis and uterine suspension were performed. The main observation indicators were proportions of retrograde menstruation, peritoneal endometriosis, and tubal adhesions in laparoscopy groups, and spontaneous pregnancy rates within 6 months. RESULTS The proportions of retrograde menstruation were 92.2% and 93.1% in Study Group 1 and Study Group 2, respectively, with no statistical significance. The proportions of peritoneal endometriosis were 51.0% and 64.7%, with a statistically significant difference. The proportions of tubal adhesions were 31.4% and 36.2%, with no statistical significance. The pregnancy rates within 6 months were 73.9%, 52.6%, and 13.1%, with a statistically significant difference for pairwise comparisons. CONCLUSIONS The pregnancy rate of primary infertile patients with patent fallopian tubes complicated with pelvic effusion can be significantly improved through early laparoscopic surgery (exploration and treatment).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.