Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36518014›Full record

SynthesisTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2023

Effectiveness of self-financing patient-led support groups in the management of hypertension and diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: Systematic review.

Richard E Sanya, Erin Stewart Johnston, Peter Kibe, Mahmoud Werfalli, Sloan Mahone, Naomi S Levitt, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, Gershim Asiki

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Richard E SanyaChronic Diseases Management Unit, African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Erin Stewart JohnstonJulius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter KibeChronic Diseases Management Unit, African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mahmoud WerfalliDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya.
Sloan MahoneOxford Centre for the History of Science, Medicine and Technology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Naomi S LevittChronic Disease Initiative for Africa Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kerstin Klipstein-GrobuschJulius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gershim AsikiChronic Diseases Management Unit, African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
African Population and Health Research Center · KEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Benghazi · LYUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V004484/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is insufficient evidence on the role of self-financing patient support groups in the control of blood pressure (BP) and/or diabetes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We conducted a systematic review to investigate the effectiveness of these groups in BP and glycaemic control.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Global Health, African Journals Online, CINAHL and African Index Medicus for published peer-reviewed articles from inception up to November 2021. Grey literature was obtained from OpenGrey. Studies on patient support groups for hypertension and/or diabetes with a component of pooling financial resources, conducted in LMICs, were included. Narrative reviews, commentaries, editorials and articles published in languages other than English and French were excluded. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the National Institutes of Health Quality assessment tool and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Results are reported according to PRISMA guidelines.

resultsOf 724 records screened, three studies met the criteria: two trials conducted in Kenya and a retrospective cohort study conducted in Cambodia. All studies reported improvement in BP control after 12 months follow-up with reductions in systolic BP of 23, 14.8, and 16.9 mmHg, respectively. Two studies reported diabetes parameters. The first reported improvement in HbA1c (reduction from baseline 10.8%, to 10.6% at 6 months) and random blood sugar (baseline 8.9 mmol/L, to 8.5 mmol/L at 6 months) but these changes did not achieve statistical significance. The second reported a reduction in fasting blood glucose (baseline-216 mg/dl, 12 months-159 mg/dl) in diabetic patients on medication.

conclusionSelf-financing patient support groups for diabetes and hypertension are potentially effective in the control of BP and diabetes in LMICs. More studies are needed to add to the scarce evidence base on the role of self-financing patient support groups.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHypertensionDeveloping CountriesHumansRetrospective StudiesSelf-Help Groupschronic carediabetesfinancinghypertensionlow- and middle-income countriespatient support groupssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36518014
PMCPMC10107175
OpenAlexW4312128911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.