ArticlePlant methods2022
Species-specific basecallers improve actual accuracy of nanopore sequencing in plants.
Article in Plant methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanopore Sequencing for Chikungunya Virus: Principles and Application.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Virulence gains in the Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici PstS10 lineage correlate with expression polymorphism in a candidate Avr effector.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Genome Assembly of Spinifex sericeus Provides Insights into Repetitive Content and Haplotype Variation in a Dioecious Coastal Grass.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- SquiDBase: a community resource of raw nanopore data from microbes.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Efficient lossless compression of nanopore sequencing signals.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- The role of the gut microbiome in antibiotic-driven antimicrobial resistance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- MrHAMER2: high-accuracy long-read RNA sequencing to decode isoform-specific variation in viral transcripts during latency.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive comparison of the third-generation sequencing tools for bacterial 6mA profiling.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A Hitchhiker's Guide to long-read genomic analysis.Genome research · 2025Review
- Merging High-Throughput, Amplicon-Based Second and Third Generation Sequencing Data: An Integrative and Modular Data Analysis Framework for Haplotype Prediction and Output Evaluation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of Illumina, PacBio, and nanopore for 16S rRNA gene sequencing of rabbit's gut microbiota.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2025Article
- AAVolve: Concatenated long-read deep sequencing enables whole capsid tracking during shuffled AAV library selection.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024Article
- Moving Beyond Oxford Nanopore Standard Procedures: New Insights from Water and Multiple Fish Microbiomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- A telomere-to-telomere Eucalyptus regnans genome: unveiling haplotype variance in structure and genes within one of the world's tallest trees.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Combining Short- and Long-Read Sequencing Technologies to Identify SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Wastewater.Viruses · 2024Article
- Sequencing accuracy and systematic errors of nanopore direct RNA sequencing.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Streamlining remote nanopore data access with slow5curl.GigaScience · 2024Article
- Exploring the role of polymorphic interspecies structural variants in reproductive isolation and adaptive divergence in Eucalyptus.GigaScience · 2024Article
- Comparison of Nanopore and Synthesis-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms for SARS-CoV-2 Variant Monitoring in Wastewater.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- HycDemux: a hybrid unsupervised approach for accurate barcoded sample demultiplexing in nanopore sequencing.Genome biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong-read sequencing platforms offered by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) allow native DNA containing epigenetic modifications to be directly sequenced, but can be limited by lower per-base accuracies. A key step post-sequencing is basecalling, the process of converting raw electrical signals produced by the sequencing device into nucleotide sequences. This is challenging as current basecallers are primarily based on mixtures of model species for training. Here we utilise both ONT PromethION and higher accuracy PacBio Sequel II HiFi sequencing on two plants, Phebalium stellatum and Xanthorrhoea johnsonii, to train species-specific basecaller models with the aim of improving per-base accuracy. We investigate sequencing accuracies achieved by ONT basecallers and assess accuracy gains by training single-species and species-specific basecaller models. We also evaluate accuracy gains from ONT's improved flowcells (R10.4, FLO-PRO112) and sequencing kits (SQK-LSK112). For the truth dataset for both model training and accuracy assessment, we developed highly accurate, contiguous diploid reference genomes with PacBio Sequel II HiFi reads.
resultsBasecalling with ONT Guppy 5 and 6 super-accurate gave almost identical results, attaining read accuracies of 91.96% and 94.15%. Guppy's plant-specific model gave highly mixed results, attaining read accuracies of 91.47% and 96.18%. Species-specific basecalling models improved read accuracy, attaining 93.24% and 95.16% read accuracies. R10.4 sequencing kits also improve sequencing accuracy, attaining read accuracies of 95.46% (super-accurate) and 96.87% (species-specific).
conclusionsThe use of a single mixed-species basecaller model, such as ONT Guppy super-accurate, may be reducing the accuracy of nanopore sequencing, due to conflicting genome biology within the training dataset and study species. Training of single-species and genome-specific basecaller models improves read accuracy. Studies that aim to do large-scale long-read genotyping would primarily benefit from training their own basecalling models. Such studies could use sequencing accuracy gains and improving bioinformatics tools to improve study outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.