ArticleBMC psychiatry2022
Clinical implementation of suicide risk prediction models in healthcare: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Model-Guided Clinical Decision Support for Suicide Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- "Triggering the palliative intent"?: A qualitative implementation evaluation of a prognostication model for advanced dementia (PRO-MADE) in a geriatric tertiary care setting for the integration of early palliative care.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Validation of a Risk-Prediction Model in the Presence of Outcome Misclassification.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Research Domain Criteria and Deaths by Suicide in the National Violent Death Reporting System.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Predicting and Preventing Suicide at Entry to Mental Health Care: A Community-Engaged, Machine Learning Model Implementation.NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery · 2026Article
- External Validation of Epic's Risk of Opioid Abuse and Overdose Model Among Primary Care Patients in Three Health Systems.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Primary healthcare professionals' perspectives on mobility limitation assessment and predictive model optimization for community-dwelling older adults: a qualitative research.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Exploring the Perspectives of Pediatric Health Care Providers, Youth Patients, and Caregivers on Machine Learning Suicide Risk Classification: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- The Value of Clinical Prediction Models in General Practice: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Perspectives of People With Lived Experience of Depression and General Practitioners.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Acceptability of linking individual credit, financial, and public records data to healthcare records for suicide risk machine learning models.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- Protocol for Designing a Model to Predict the Likelihood of Psychosis From Electronic Health Records Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning.The Permanente journal · 2024Article
- Innovation and challenges of artificial intelligence technology in personalized healthcare.Scientific reports · 2024Review
- Development and application of a nomogram model for the prediction of carbapenem-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- Adolescent, Parent, and Provider Perceptions of a Predictive Algorithm to Identify Adolescent Suicide Risk in Primary Care.Academic pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuicide risk prediction models derived from electronic health records (EHR) are a novel innovation in suicide prevention but there is little evidence to guide their implementation.
methodsIn this qualitative study, 30 clinicians and 10 health care administrators were interviewed from one health system anticipating implementation of an automated EHR-derived suicide risk prediction model and two health systems piloting different implementation approaches. Site-tailored interview guides focused on respondents' expectations for and experiences with suicide risk prediction models in clinical practice, and suggestions for improving implementation. Interview prompts and content analysis were guided by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs.
resultsAdministrators and clinicians found use of the suicide risk prediction model and the two implementation approaches acceptable. Clinicians desired opportunities for early buy-in, implementation decision-making, and feedback. They wanted to better understand how this manner of risk identification enhanced existing suicide prevention efforts. They also wanted additional training to understand how the model determined risk, particularly after patients they expected to see identified by the model were not flagged at-risk and patients they did not expect to see identified were. Clinicians were concerned about having enough suicide prevention resources for potentially increased demand and about their personal liability; they wanted clear procedures for situations when they could not reach patients or when patients remained at-risk over a sustained period. Suggestions for making risk model workflows more efficient and less burdensome included consolidating suicide risk information in a dedicated module in the EHR and populating risk assessment scores and text in clinical notes.
conclusionHealth systems considering suicide risk model implementation should engage clinicians early in the process to ensure they understand how risk models estimate risk and add value to existing workflows, clarify clinician role expectations, and summarize risk information in a convenient place in the EHR to support high-quality patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.