ArticleBMC cancer2022
A novel inflammation-nutrition biomarker score for predicting prognosis of patients with cancer: results from a multicenter study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Development and validation of a novel preoperative computed tomography staging model integrating Immune, Inflammatory, and nutritional biomarkers for prognostic prediction in gastric adenocarcinoma patients undergoing radical resection: a multicenter study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model Based on Peripheral Blood Biomarkers for Esophageal Cancer Risk Prediction.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Establishment and Validation of a Nomogram Based on Inflammation-Immunity-Nutrition Biomarker Scores to Predict Postoperative Early Recurrence in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory and nutritional markers in patients with resectable colon cancer: a retrospective observational study.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of nutritional risk index in esophageal cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2025Article
- Novel inflammatory-nutritional prognostic index for advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy and prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Combined effects of nutrition, inflammatory status, and sleep quality on mortality in cancer survivors.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- The Clinical Impact of Prognostic Nutritional Index at Recurrence of Pancreatic Cancer.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to develop an innovative inflammation-nutrition biomarker score (INS) system to stratify the prognoses of patients with cancer.
methodsA total of 5,221 patients with cancer from multiple centers in China between June 2010 and December 2017 were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. We compared the commonly used inflammation and nutrition biomarkers and selected the most valuable to develop the novel INS system. Survival curves were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test to evaluate the difference in survival rates between groups. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the association between biomarkers and all-cause mortality.
resultsAs the risk stratification of INS increased (1 to 5), the rate of death for cancer patients gradually increased (25.43% vs. 37.09% vs. 44.59% vs. 56.21% vs. 61.65%, p < 0.001). The INS system was associated with all-cause mortality in patients with cancer. Patients with both high inflammation and nutrition risk (INS = 5) were estimated to have much worse prognosis than those with neither (HR, 2.606; 95%CI, 2.261-3.003, p < 0.001). Subsequently, the results of randomized internal validation also confirmed that INS system had an ideal effect in identifying adverse outcomes. In addition, the INS system could be used as a supplement to pathological stages in prognosis assessment, and had a higher predictive value in comparison with the constitute biomarkers. Patients with a high INS had less functional ability, reduced quality of life, and were at high risk of malnutrition, cachexia, and poor short-term outcomes.
conclusionThe INS system based on inflammation and nutrition biomarkers is a simple and effective prognostic stratification tool for patients with cancer, which can provide a valuable reference for clinical prognosis assessment and treatment strategy formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.