Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36517772›Full record

ArticleBMC molecular and cell biology2022

Metabolic analysis of the regulatory mechanism of sugars on secondary flowering in Magnolia.

Lingjuan Xuan, Qianqian Wang, Zhigao Liu, Bin Xu, Shaoyu Cheng, Yingjia Zhang, Danying Lu, Bin Dong, Dongmei Zhang, Lang Zhang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC molecular and cell biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lingjuan Xuan *School of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Zhejiang, 311300, Hangzhou, China.
Qianqian Wang *School of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Zhejiang, 311300, Hangzhou, China.
Zhigao Liu *School of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Zhejiang, 311300, Hangzhou, China.
Bin Xu *School of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Zhejiang, 311300, Hangzhou, China.
Shaoyu ChengSchool of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Zhejiang, 311300, Hangzhou, China.
Yingjia ZhangSchool of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Zhejiang, 311300, Hangzhou, China.
Danying LuSchool of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Zhejiang, 311300, Hangzhou, China.
Bin DongSchool of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Zhejiang, 311300, Hangzhou, China. Dongbin@zafu.edu.cn.
Dongmei ZhangShanghai Academy of Landscape Architecture Science and Planning, Shanghai, 200232, China.
Lang ZhangShanghai Academy of Landscape Architecture Science and Planning, Shanghai, 200232, China.
Jingjing MaSchool of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Zhejiang, 311300, Hangzhou, China. Jingjingma@zafu.edu.cn.
Yamei ShenSchool of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Zhejiang, 311300, Hangzhou, China. yameishen@zafu.edu.cn.
Zhejiang A & F University · CNShanghai Institute of Landscape Gardening · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnolia, a traditional and important ornamental plant in urban greening, has been cultivated for about 2000 years in China for its elegant flower shape and gorgeous flower color. Most varieties of Magnolia bloom once a year in spring, whereas a few others, such as Magnolia liliiflora Desr. 'Hongyuanbao', also bloom for the second time in summer or early autumn. Such a twice flowering trait is desirable for its high ornamental value, while its underlying mechanism remains unclear.

methodsParaffin section was used to show the flowering time and phenotypic changes of M. liliiflora 'Hongyuanbao' during the twice flowering periods from March 28 to August 25, 2018. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was then performed to explore the chemical metabolites through the twice flower bud differentiation process in 'Hongyuanbao', and the metabolites were screened and identified by orthogonal projection to latent structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis (KEGG) was used to reveal the relationship between the sugar metabolites and twice-flowering characteristic. To further investigate the potential role of sucrose and trehalose on flowering regulation of 'Hongyuanbao', the plants once finished the spring flowering were regularly sprayed with sucrose and trehalose solutions at 30 mM, 60 mM, and 90 mM concentrations from April 22, 2019. The flower bud differentiation processes of sprayed plants were observed and the expression patterns of the genes involved in sucrose and trehalose metabolic pathways were studied by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR).

resultsIt showed that 'Hongyuanbao' could complete flower bud differentiation twice in a year and flowered in both spring and summer. The metabolites of flower bud differentiation had a significant variation between the first and second flower buds. Compared to the first flower bud differentiation process, the metabolites in the sucrose and trehalose metabolic pathways were significantly up-regulated during the second flower bud differentiation process. Besides that, the expression levels of a number of trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (TPS) genes including MlTPS1, MlTPS5, MlTPS6, MlTPS7 and MlTPS9 were substantially increased in the second flower differentiation process compared with the first process. Exogenous treatments indicated that compared to the control plants (sprayed with water, CK), all three concentrations of trehalose could accelerate flowering and the effect of 60 mM concentration was the most significant. For the sucrose foliar spray, only the 60 mM concentration accelerated flowering compared with CK. It suggested that different concentration of trehalose and sucrose might have different effects. Expression analysis showed that sucrose treatment increased the transcription levels of MlTPS5 and MlTPS6, whereas trehalose treatment increased MlTPS1, showing that different MlTPS genes took part in sucrose and trehalose metabolic pathways respectively. The expression levels of a number of flowering-related genes, such as MlFT, MlLFY, and MlSPL were also increased in response to the sprays of sucrose and trehalose.

conclusionsWe provide a novel insight into the effect of sucrose and trehalose on the flowering process in Magnolia. Under the different sugar contents treatments, the time of flower bud differentiation of Magnolia was advanced. Induced and accelerated flowering in response to sucrose and trehalose foliar spray, coupled with elevated expression of trehalose regulatory and response genes, suggests that secondary flower bud formation is a promoted by altered endogenous sucrose and trehalose levels. Those results give a new understanding of sucrose and trehalose on twice-flowering in Magnolia and provide a preliminary speculation for inducing and accelerating the flowering process in Magnolia.

Indexed as

MagnoliaGene Expression Regulation, PlantSucroseSugarsTrehaloseSucroseSugarsTrehaloseFlower bud differentiationMagnoliaMetabolite analysisMlTPS genesSucrose and trehalose spraying

Identifiers

PMID36517772
PMCPMC9753265
OpenAlexW4311448145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.