Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36517757›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Biomechanical assessment of disease outcome in surgical interventions for medial meniscal posterior root tears: a finite element analysis.

Zhi Xu, Yuwan Li, Jingcheng Rao, Ying Jin, Yushun Huang, Xing Xu, Yi Liu, Shoujin Tian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhi XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Zhangjiagang Fifth People's Hospital, Zhangjiagang, 215600, Jiangsu, China.
Yuwan LiDepartment of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jingcheng RaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Suqian Hospital of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group, Suqian, 223800, Jiangsu, China.
Ying JinDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No.149 Dalian Road, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, China.
Yushun HuangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Jen Ching memorial Hospital, Kunshan, 215300, Jiangsu, China.
Xing XuDepartment of Medicine, Zhijin People's Hospital, Zhijin, 552100, Guizhou, China.
Yi LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No.149 Dalian Road, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, China. liuyiguyike@163.com.
Shoujin TianDepartment of Orthopaedics, Zhangjiagang First People's Hospital, No.68 Jiyang West Road, Zhangjiagang, 215600, Jiangsu, China. tiansurgeon@163.com.
Soochow University · CNZunyi Medical University · CNNanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe adverse consequences of medial meniscus posterior root tears have become increasingly familiar to surgeons, and treatment strategies have become increasingly abundant. In this paper, the finite element gait analysis method was used to explore the differences in the biomechanical characteristics of the knee joint under different conditions.

methodsBased on CT computed tomography and MR images, (I) an intact knee (IK) model with bone, cartilage, meniscus and main ligaments was established. Based on this model, the posterior root of the medial meniscus was resected, and (ii) the partial tear (PT) model, (iii) the entire radial tear (ERT) model, and (iv) the entire oblique tear (EOT) model were established according to the scope and degree of resection. Then, the (v) meniscus repair (MR) model and (vi) partial meniscectomy (PM) model were developed according to the operation method. The differences in stress, displacement and contact area among different models were evaluated under ISO gait loading conditions.

resultsUnder gait loading, there was no significant difference in the maximum stress of the medial and lateral tibiofemoral joints among the six models. Compared with the medial tibiofemoral joint stress of the IK model, the stress of the PM model increased by 8.3%, while that of the MR model decreased by 18.9%; at the same time, the contact stress of the medial tibiofemoral joint of the ERT and EOT models increased by 17.9 and 25.3%, respectively. The displacement of the medial meniscus in the ERT and EOT models was significantly larger than that in the IK model (P < 0.05), and the tibial and femoral contact areas of these two models were lower than those of the IK model (P < 0.05).

conclusionsThe integrity of the posterior root of the medial meniscus plays an important role in maintaining normal tibial-femoral joint contact mechanics. Partial meniscectomy is not beneficial for improving the tibial-thigh contact situation. Meniscal repair has a positive effect on restoring the normal biomechanical properties of the medial meniscus.

Indexed as

Cartilage DiseasesKnee InjuriesTibial Meniscus InjuriesBiomechanical PhenomenaFinite Element AnalysisHumansKnee JointMenisci, TibialBiomechanicsFinite element analysisGait cyclemeniscus repairPartial meniscectomyPosterior root tear of medial meniscus

Identifiers

PMID36517757
PMCPMC9749342
OpenAlexW4311496588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.