ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2023
Comparison of Predictability in Central Corneal Thickness Reduction After SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia Correction.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of visual quality and optical zones after TransPRK, SMILE, and FS-LASIK myopia correction procedures.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Trial
- A Comparative and Prospective Study of Corneal Consumption and Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK Performed on the Contralateral Eyes With High Myopic Astigmatism.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Trial
- Predictability comparison of central corneal thickness reduction in myopic eyes with or without astigmatism undergoing FS-LASIK with two profiles of MEL 90.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of corneal thickness measured using the new Revo FC optical coherence tomographer and the pentacam Scheimpflug-based imaging system.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Neuropathic corneal pain following refractive surgery: risk factors, clinical manifestations, imaging and proteomic characteristics.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Comparison of corneal consumption in correcting high with-the-rule astigmatism between refractive lenticule extraction and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Study of corneal and retinal thicknesses at five years after FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopia.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Comparison of planned versus achieved central corneal stromal thickness reduction in SMILE versus FS-LASIK: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo compare central corneal thickness (CCT) reduction after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in eyes with high myopia.
methodsIn this prospective, consecutive study, 70 eyes with high myopia undergoing SMILE (n = 35) or FS-LASIK (n = 35) were recruited. Corneal topography images were acquired using the Pentacam HR imaging system preoperatively and at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively. Predicted CCT reduction was extracted directly from the VisuMax femtosecond laser system or MEL 80 excimer laser platform. The achieved CCT reduction was determined using corneal thickness difference maps from the Pentacam. Comparative statistics and linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the predictability in stromal thickness reduction.
resultsThe mean predicted CCT reductions were 152.9 ± 6.7 μm and 150.9 ± 7.3 μm in the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups, respectively, with no statistical difference. For each follow-up time, no significant difference was noted in the two groups in the achieved CCT reduction. At 6-month follow-up, the CCT reductions were overestimated to be 23.06 ± 6.97 µm and 28.29 ± 13.92 µm in the SMILE and FS-LASIK groups, respectively (P = 0.003), showing statistical difference. Regression analysis revealed that the positive correlation between achieved and predicted CCT reductions was stronger in SMILE (R
conclusionsSystematically overestimated CCT reduction is found after SMILE and FS-LASIK in high myopia correction. Deviations between planned and achieved CCT reductions are more pronounced in FS-LASIK than in SMILE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.