Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36517607›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2023

Purification, full-length sequencing and genomic origin mapping of eccDNA.

Yuangao Wang, Meng Wang, Yi Zhang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuangao WangHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1529-4702
Meng WangHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1072-7073
Yi ZhangHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, MA, USA. yzhang@genetics.med.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2789-0811

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) was discovered more than half a century ago. However, its biogenesis and function have just begun to be elucidated. One hurdle that has prevented our understanding of eccDNA is the difficulty in obtaining pure eccDNA from cells. The current eccDNA purification methods mainly rely on depleting linear DNAs by exonuclease digestion after obtaining crude circles by alkaline lysis. Owing to eccDNA's low abundance and heterogeneous size, the current purification methods are not efficient in obtaining pure eccDNA. Here we describe a new three-step eccDNA purification (3SEP) procedure that adds a step to recover circular DNA, but not linear DNA that escape from the exonuclease digestion, whereby 3SEP results in eccDNA preparations with high purity and reproducibility. Additionally, we developed a full-length eccDNA sequencing technique by combining rolling-circle amplification with Nanopore sequencing. Accordingly, we developed a full-length eccDNA caller (Flec) to call the consensus sequence of multiple tandem copies of eccDNA contained within the debranched rolling-circle amplification product and map the consensus to its genomic origin. Collectively, our protocol will facilitate eccDNA identification and characterization, and has the potential for diagnostic and clinical applications. For a well-trained molecular biologist, it takes ~1-2 d to purify eccDNAs, another 5-6 d to carry out Nanopore library preparation and sequencing, and 1-5 d for an experienced bioinformatic scientist to analyze the data.

Indexed as

DNA, CircularGenomeChromosome MappingGenomicsReproducibility of ResultsDNA, Circular

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.