Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36517468›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Accuracy and data efficiency in deep learning models of protein expression.

Evangelos-Marios Nikolados, Arin Wongprommoon, Oisin Mac Aodha, Guillaume Cambray, Diego A Oyarzún

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Systematic optimization ofEngineering microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Probiotic-Based Materials as Living Therapeutics.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Optimization of regulatory DNA with active learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Evangelos-Marios NikoladosSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JH, UK.
Arin WongprommoonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JH, UK.
Oisin Mac AodhaSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, UK.
Guillaume CambrayDiversité des Génomes et Interactions Microorganismes Insectes, University of Montpellier, INRAE UMR 1333, Montpellier, France.
Diego A OyarzúnSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JH, UK. d.oyarzun@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-5278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic biology often involves engineering microbial strains to express high-value proteins. Thanks to progress in rapid DNA synthesis and sequencing, deep learning has emerged as a promising approach to build sequence-to-expression models for strain optimization. But such models need large and costly training data that create steep entry barriers for many laboratories. Here we study the relation between accuracy and data efficiency in an atlas of machine learning models trained on datasets of varied size and sequence diversity. We show that deep learning can achieve good prediction accuracy with much smaller datasets than previously thought. We demonstrate that controlled sequence diversity leads to substantial gains in data efficiency and employed Explainable AI to show that convolutional neural networks can finely discriminate between input DNA sequences. Our results provide guidelines for designing genotype-phenotype screens that balance cost and quality of training data, thus helping promote the wider adoption of deep learning in the biotechnology sector.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID36517468
PMCPMC9751117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.