Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36517252›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

The Protective Effect of Social Reward on Opioid and Psychostimulant Reward and Relapse: Behavior, Pharmacology, and Brain Regions.

Marco Venniro, Rosa A M Marino, Jonathan J Chow, Daniele Caprioli, David H Epstein, Leslie A Ramsey, Yavin Shaham

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A rat model of volitional mutual social interactions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The subjective value of social context in people who use cannabis.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Neuroscience in addiction research.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco VenniroDepartment of Anatomy & Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland marco.venniro@som.umaryland.edu yavin.shaham@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-7653-957X
Rosa A M MarinoDepartment of Anatomy & Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jonathan J ChowIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Daniele CaprioliDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
David H EpsteinIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Leslie A RamseyIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Yavin ShahamIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland marco.venniro@som.umaryland.edu yavin.shaham@nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USFondazione Santa Lucia · IT

Funding

The protective effect of volitional social interaction on drug addictionR00DA047976 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI VENNIRO, MARCO · 2021 to 2023
$747k
Neurobiological mechanisms underlying heroin relapse after social-induced abstinence and preference for social interaction vs. opioid drugsFI2GM142476 · NIGMS · U.S. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI CHOW, JONATHAN J · 2022 to 2022
–
NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA047976NIGMS NIH HHS FI2 GM142476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, most modern neuroscience research on addiction using animal models did not incorporate manipulations of social factors. Social factors play a critical role in human addiction: social isolation and exclusion can promote drug use and relapse, while social connections and inclusion tend to be protective. Here, we discuss the state of the literature on social factors in animal models of opioid and psychostimulant preference, self-administration, and relapse. We first summarize results from rodent studies on behavioral, pharmacological, and circuit mechanisms of the protective effect of traditional experimenter-controlled social interaction procedures on opioid and psychostimulant conditioned place preference, self-administration, and relapse. Next, we summarize behavioral and brain-mechanism results from studies using newer operant social-interaction procedures that inhibit opioid and psychostimulant self-administration and relapse. We conclude by discussing how the reviewed studies point to future directions for the addiction field and other neuroscience and psychiatric fields, and their implications for mechanistic understanding of addiction and development of new treatments.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCentral Nervous System StimulantsAnimalsBrainHumansRecurrenceRewardAnalgesics, OpioidCentral Nervous System Stimulantsaddictionanimal modelscravingopioidspsychostimulantssocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID36517252
PMCPMC9794371
OpenAlexW4311666193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.