Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36517093›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Development and applications of the anaesthetists' non-technical skills behavioural marker system: protocol for a systematic review.

Jiamin Kang, Jiale Hu, Chunji Yan, Xueyan Xing, Shumin Tu, Fang Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiamin KangSchool of Nursing, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3889-0654
Jiale HuDepartment of Nurse Anesthesia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Chunji YanSchool of Nursing, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6586-3796
Xueyan XingSchool of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University Affiliated Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shumin TuSchool of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University Affiliated Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fang ZhouSchool of Nursing, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China meadow_zh@hotmail.com.
Xuzhou Medical College · CNBeijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital · CNVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe high incidence of unsafe anaesthetic care leads to adverse events and increases the burden on patient safety. An important reason for unsafe anaesthesia care is the lack of non-technical skills (NTS), which are defined as personal cognitive, social or interpersonal skills, among anaesthetists. The anaesthetists' NTS (ANTS) behavioural marker system has been widely used to evaluate and improve anaesthetists' behavioural performance to ensure patient safety. This protocol describes a planned systematic review aiming to determine the validity and reliability of the ANTS behavioural marker system and its application as a tool for the training and assessment of ANTS and for improving patient safety. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review follows the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol. Studies that applied the ANTS behavioural marker system in a meaningful way, including using the ANTS behavioural marker system to guide data collection, analysis, coding, measurement, and/or reporting, which have been published in peer-reviewed journals, will be eligible. A citation search strategy will be employed. We will search Scopus and Web of Science for publications from 2002 to May 2022, which cite the three original ANTS behavioural marker system publications by Fletcher ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this study. The findings will be disseminated primarily through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022297773.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyClinical CompetenceAnesthetistsChecklistHumansReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topicadult anaesthesiaadverse eventshealth & safetyrisk management

Identifiers

PMID36517093
PMCPMC9756218
OpenAlexW4311474378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.