Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36516722›Full record

ReviewUltrasonics sonochemistry2023

Individual and interactive effect of ultrasound pre-treatment on drying kinetics and biochemical qualities of food: A critical review.

R Pandiselvam, Alev Yüksel Aydar, Naciye Kutlu, Raouf Aslam, Prashant Sahni, Swati Mitharwal, Mohsen Gavahian, Manoj Kumar, António Raposo, Sunghoon Yoo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Study on Physicochemical Properties of Food Protein.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

R PandiselvamPhysiology, Biochemistry and Post-Harvest Technology Division, ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute (CPCRI), Kasaragod 671 124, Kerala, India. Electronic address: anbupandi1989@yahoo.co.in.
Alev Yüksel AydarDepartment of Food Engineering, Manisa Celal Bayar University, 45140, Yunusemre, Manisa, Turkiye. Electronic address: alevyuksel.aydar@cbu.edu.tr.
Naciye KutluDepartment of Food Processing, Aydıntepe Vocational College, Bayburt University, 69500 Aydıntepe, Bayburt, Turkiye.
Raouf AslamDepartment of Processing and Food Engineering, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Prashant SahniCollege of Dairy and Food Technology, Agriculture University, Jodhpur, 342304, Rajasthan, India.
Swati MitharwalDepartment of Food Science and Technology, National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship & Management (NIFTEM), Kundli 131028, India.
Mohsen GavahianDepartment of Food Science, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan.
Manoj KumarChemical and Biochemical Processing Division, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Matunga, Mumbai 400019, India.
António RaposoCBIOS (Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies), Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal.
Sunghoon YooAudit Team, Hanmoo Convention (Oakwood Premier), 49, Teheran-ro 87-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06164, South Korea. Electronic address: sunghoon@hmcon.co.kr.
Heesup HanCollege of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, 98 Gunja-Dong, Gwanjin-Gu, Seoul 143-747, South Korea. Electronic address: heesup.han@gmail.com.
Anjineyulu KothakotaAgro-Processing & Technology Division, CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology (NIIST), Trivandrum 695019, Kerala, India.
Bayburt University · TRCentral Institute for Research on Cotton Technology · INCentral Plantation Crops Research Institute · INManisa Celal Bayar University · TRNational Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology · INNational Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management · INNational Pingtung University of Science and Technology · TWPunjab Agricultural University · INSejong University · KRSwami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University · INUniversidade Lusófona · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the earliest and most prevalent processing methods to increase the shelf-life of foods is drying. In recent years, there has been an increased demand to improve product quality while lowering processing times, expenses, and energy usage in the drying process. Pre-treatments are therefore effectively used before drying to enhance heat and mass transfer, increase drying efficiency, and lessen degradation of final product quality. When food is dried, changes are expected in its taste, color, texture, and physical, chemical, and microbial properties. This has led to the need for research and development into the creation of new and effective pre-treatment technologies including high-pressure processing, pulsed electric field, ultraviolet irradiation, and ultrasound. Sound waves that have a frequency >20 kHz, which is above the upper limit of the audible frequency range, are referred to as "ultrasound". Ultrasonication (US) is a non-thermal technology, that has mechanical, cavitational, and sponge effects on food materials. Ultrasound pre-treatment enhances the drying characteristics by producing microchannels in the food tissue, facilitating internal moisture diffusion in the finished product, and lowering the barrier to water migration. The goal of ultrasound pre-treatment is to save processing time, conserve energy, and enhance the quality, safety, and shelf-life of food products. This study presents a comprehensive overview of the fundamentals of ultrasound, its mechanism, and how the individual effects of ultrasonic pre-treatment and the interactive effects of ultrasound-assisted technologies affect the drying kinetics, bioactive components, color, textural, and sensory qualities of food. The difficulties that can arise when using ultrasound technology as a drying pretreatment approach, such as inadequate management of heat, the employment of ultrasound at a limited frequency, and the generation of free radicals, have also been explained.

Indexed as

DesiccationFood HandlingChemical PhenomenaFoodKineticsCavitationDryingDrying kineticsFood qualityPre-treatmentUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID36516722
PMCPMC9755246
OpenAlexW4311860830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.