ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2023
Characterization of material properties and deformation in the ANGUS phantom during mild head impacts using MRI.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acoustic Detection of Intracranial Cavitation Induced by Blunt Impacts in Polyacrylamide Human Head Models Across Varying Orientations.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Multimodal characterization of intracranial biomechanics in a 3D biofidelic head surrogate.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026Article
- Could MR elastography be a way to make violent contact sports safer?European radiology · 2025Article
- Mechanically anisotropic phantoms for magnetic resonance elastography.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Anatomical Features and Material Properties of Human Surrogate Head Models Affect Spatial and Temporal Brain Motion under Blunt Impact.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Viscoelastic polyacrylamide MR elastography phantoms with tunable damping ratio independent of shear stiffness.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2024Article
- Simultaneous High-Frame-Rate Acoustic Plane-Wave and Optical Imaging of Intracranial Cavitation in Polyacrylamide Brain Phantoms during Blunt Force Impact.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Polypathologies and Animal Models of Traumatic Brain Injury.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Mechanical characterization data of polyacrylamide hydrogel formulations and 3D printed PLA for application in human head phantoms.Data in brief · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major health concern affecting both military and civilian populations. Despite notable advances in TBI research in recent years, there remains a significant gap in linking the impulsive loadings from a blast or a blunt impact to the clinical injury patterns observed in TBI. Synthetic head models or phantoms can be used to establish this link as they can be constructed with geometry, anatomy, and material properties that match the human brain, and can be used as an alternative to animal models. This study presents one such phantom called the Anthropomorphic Neurologic Gyrencephalic Unified Standard (ANGUS) phantom, which is an idealized gyrencephalic brain phantom composed of polyacrylamide gel. Here we mechanically characterized the ANGUS phantom using tagged magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and then compared the outcomes to data obtained in healthy volunteers. The direct comparison between the phantom's response and the data from a cohort of in vivo human subjects demonstrate that the ANGUS phantom may be an appropriate model for bulk tissue response and gyral dynamics of the human brain under small amplitude linear impulses. However, the phantom's response differs from that of the in vivo human brain under rotational impacts, suggesting avenues for future improvements to the phantom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.