Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36516456›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2023

Knowledge Engineering in Chemistry: From Expert Systems to Agents of Creation.

Aleksandar Kondinski, Jiaru Bai, Sebastian Mosbach, Jethro Akroyd, Markus Kraft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Data-Driven Polyoxometalate Chemistry.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aleksandar KondinskiDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-0559-0172
Jiaru BaiDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-1246-1993
Sebastian MosbachDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-7018-9433
Jethro AkroydDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-2143-8656
Markus KraftDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-4293-8924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Passing knowledge from human to human is a natural process that has continued since the beginning of humankind. Over the past few decades, we have witnessed that knowledge is no longer passed only between humans but also from humans to machines. The latter form of knowledge transfer represents a cornerstone in artificial intelligence (AI) and lays the foundation for knowledge engineering (KE). In order to pass knowledge to machines, humans need to structure, formalize, and make knowledge machine-readable. Subsequently, humans also need to develop software that emulates their decision-making process. In order to engineer chemical knowledge, chemists are often required to challenge their understanding of chemistry and thinking processes, which may help improve the structure of chemical knowledge.Knowledge engineering in chemistry dates from the development of expert systems that emulated the thinking process of analytical and organic chemists. Since then, many different expert systems employing rather limited knowledge bases have been developed, solving problems in retrosynthesis, analytical chemistry, chemical risk assessment, etc. However, toward the end of the 20th century, the AI winters slowed down the development of expert systems for chemistry. At the same time, the increasing complexity of chemical research, alongside the limitations of the available computing tools, made it difficult for many chemistry expert systems to keep pace.In the past two decades, the semantic web, the popularization of object-oriented programming, and the increase in computational power have revitalized knowledge engineering. Knowledge formalization through ontologies has become commonplace, triggering the subsequent development of knowledge graphs and cognitive software agents. These tools enable the possibility of interoperability, enabling the representation of more complex systems, inference capabilities, and the synthesis of new knowledge.This Account introduces the history, the core principles of KE, and its applications within the broad realm of chemical research and engineering. In this regard, we first discuss how chemical knowledge is formalized and how a chemist's cognition can be emulated with the help of reasoning algorithms. Following this, we discuss various applications of knowledge graph and agent technology used to solve problems in chemistry related to molecular engineering, chemical mechanisms, multiscale modeling, automation of calculations and experiments, and chemist-machine interactions. These developments are discussed in the context of a universal and dynamic knowledge ecosystem, referred to as The World Avatar (TWA).

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceExpert SystemsAlgorithmsEcosystemHumans

Identifiers

PMID36516456
PMCPMC9850921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.