Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36516330›Full record

ArticleChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.)2023

Mortality Risk and Serious Cardiopulmonary Events in Moderate-to-Severe COPD: Post Hoc Analysis of the IMPACT Trial.

J Michael Wells, Gerard J Criner, David M G Halpin, MeiLan K Han, Renu Jain, Peter Lange, David A Lipson, Fernando J Martinez, Dawn Midwinter, Dave Singh and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Highlights 56th SEPAR Congress].Open respiratory archives
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

J Michael WellsDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Lung Health Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Gerard J CrinerLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
David M G HalpinUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
MeiLan K HanPulmonary and Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
Renu JainGSK, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States.
Peter LangeSection of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
David A LipsonGSK, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States.
Fernando J MartinezNew York-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, United States.
Dawn MidwinterGSK, Brentford, United Kingdom.
Dave SinghCentre for Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Hospital Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Robert A WiseJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Johns Hopkins University · USManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBPresbyterian Hospital · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · USTemple University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

GSK CTT116855GSK NCT02164513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the InforMing the Pathway of COPD Treatment (IMPACT) trial, single-inhaler fluticasone furoate (FF) /umeclidinium (UMEC) /vilanterol (VI) significantly reduced severe exacerbation rates and all-cause mortality (ACM) risk versus UMEC/VI among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This post hoc analysis aimed to define the risk of ACM during and following a moderate/severe exacerbation, and further determine the benefit-risk profile of FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI and UMEC/VI using a cardiopulmonary composite adverse event (AE) endpoint. Methods: The 52-week, double-blind IMPACT trial randomized patients with symptomatic COPD and ≥1 exacerbation in the prior year 2:2:1 to once-daily FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25mcg, FF/VI 100/25mcg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25mcg. Post hoc endpoints included the risk of ACM during, 1-90 and 91-365 days post moderate or severe exacerbation and time-to-first cardiopulmonary composite event. Results: Of the 10,355 patients included, 5034 (49%) experienced moderate/severe exacerbations. Risk of ACM was significantly increased during a severe exacerbation event compared with baseline (hazard ratio [HR]: 41.22 [95% confidence interval (CI) 26.49-64.15]; Conclusion: Results confirm a substantial mortality risk during severe exacerbations, and an underlying CV risk. FF/UMEC/VI significantly reduced the risk of a composite cardiopulmonary AE versus UMEC/VI.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseaseschronic obstructivepneumoniapulmonary diseaserespiratory therapy

Identifiers

PMID36516330
PMCPMC9995234
OpenAlexW4311574978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.