Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36516307›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2023

Survey of wild boar hunter interactions with pig farming in central Europe.

Ferenc Jánoska, Eszter Nagy, Tamás Tari, Rebeka Ráhel Nagy, Tibor Halász, Gyula Varga, Melinda Kovács, Péter Kemenszky, Gábor Nagy, Ágnes Csivincsik

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ferenc JánoskaInstitute of Wildlife Biology and Management, University of Sopron, Sopron, Hungary.
Eszter NagyInstitute of Wildlife Biology and Management, University of Sopron, Sopron, Hungary.
Tamás TariInstitute of Wildlife Biology and Management, University of Sopron, Sopron, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6459-6945
Rebeka Ráhel NagyFaculty of Science, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Tibor HalászOne Health Working Group, Department of Physiology and Animal Health, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Science, Kaposvár, Hungary.
Gyula VargaZselic Wildlife Estate, SEFAG Forestry and Wood Industry LLC, Kaposvár, Hungary.
Melinda KovácsOne Health Working Group, Department of Physiology and Animal Health, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Science, Kaposvár, Hungary.
Péter KemenszkySomogy County Hunters' Chamber, Hungarian Hunters' National Chamber, Kaposvár, Hungary.
Gábor NagyDepartment of Physiology and Animal Health, Agribiotechnology and Precision Breeding for Food Security National Laboratory, Institute of Physiology and Nutrition, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kaposvár, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4924-6322
Ágnes CsivincsikOne Health Working Group, Department of Physiology and Animal Health, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Science, Kaposvár, Hungary.
University of Sopron · HUEötvös Loránd University · HUMagyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem · HU

Funding

Hungarian National Laboratory RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00007Hungarian National ResearchOne Health 2020-4.1.1-TKP2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) is a fatal animal disease without zoonotic potential but greatly impacts human well-being, especially in the most vulnerable human communities. In Europe, ASF concerns mostly the wildlife domain of health. The main vector of the disease is confirmed to be the wild boar, though long-distance jumps of the infection are due to anthropogenic effects. This study aimed to evaluate the potential role of hunting assistant personnel (beaters and carcass handlers) in ASF spread in Hungary. Based on a personal interview survey, we attempted to identify the epidemiological risk caused by hunting activities and the hunting personnel. The interviews with 58 hunting workers confirmed that an extent backyard pig sector (13 pig farmers) and pork production system (31 pork producers) existed within the study region out of the authorities' sight. Two pig farmers did not wear special working clothes for pig caring, seven pork producers disposed of slaughter offal in the settlements periphery, and six persons regularly contacted distant pig farms. The revealed knowledge, attitude, and practice of the questioned pig farmers suggested that this sector would be very vulnerable in an epidemic situation; moreover, backyard farms would cause a great risk for wildboar populations. Considering that the study region is the third poorest region of Hungary, these findings called attention to the high epidemiologic risk of socioeconomic inequality between different regions within the European Union.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusSwine DiseasesAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnimals, WildDisease OutbreaksEuropeFarmsHumansRisk FactorsSus scrofaSwineAfrican swine feveranthropogenic transmission riskbackyard pigone healthsocioeconomic

Identifiers

PMID36516307
PMCPMC9856997
OpenAlexW4311454607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.