Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36515949›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Need for Massive Transfusion During Surgery Using Intraoperative Hemodynamic Monitoring Data.

Seung Mi Lee, Garam Lee, Tae Kyong Kim, Trang Le, Jie Hao, Young Mi Jung, Chan-Wook Park, Joong Shin Park, Jong Kwan Jun, Hyung-Chul Lee and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Machine learning in the prediction of massive transfusion in trauma: a retrospective analysis as a proof-of-concept.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Quantifying the Suitability of Biosignals Acquired During Surgery for Multimodal Analysis.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Seung Mi LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Garam LeeDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Tae Kyong KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Trang LeDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Jie HaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Young Mi JungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chan-Wook ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Joong Shin ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jong Kwan JunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hyung-Chul LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dokyoon KimDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
University of Pennsylvania · USSeoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul Metropolitan Government · KR

Funding

Ultrascale Machine Learning to Empower Discovery in Alzheimers Disease BiobanksU01AG068057 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Christos Davatzikos, Heng Huang · 2020 to 2026
$20.7M
Unravelling genetic basis of comorbidity using EHR-linked biobank dataR01GM138597 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KIM, DOKYOON · 2020 to 2023
$2.2M
Biomedical Image Computing and Informatics ClusterS10OD023495 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2017
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG068057NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM138597NIH HHS S10 OD023495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Massive transfusion is essential to prevent complications during uncontrolled intraoperative hemorrhage. As massive transfusion requires time for blood product preparation and additional medical personnel for a team-based approach, early prediction of massive transfusion is crucial for appropriate management. Objective: To evaluate a real-time prediction model for massive transfusion during surgery based on the incorporation of preoperative data and intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study used data sets from patients who underwent surgery with invasive blood pressure monitoring at Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) from 2016 to 2019 and Boramae Medical Center (BMC) from 2020 to 2021. SNUH represented the development and internal validation data sets (n = 17 986 patients), and BMC represented the external validation data sets (n = 494 patients). Data were analyzed from November 2020 to December 2021. Exposures: A deep learning-based real-time prediction model for massive transfusion. Main Outcomes and Measures: Massive transfusion was defined as a transfusion of 3 or more units of red blood cells over an hour. A preoperative prediction model for massive transfusion was developed using preoperative variables. Subsequently, a real-time prediction model using preoperative and intraoperative parameters was constructed to predict massive transfusion 10 minutes in advance. A prediction model, the massive transfusion index, calculated the risk of massive transfusion in real time. Results: Among 17 986 patients at SNUH (mean [SD] age, 58.65 [14.81] years; 9036 [50.2%] female), 416 patients (2.3%) underwent massive transfusion during the operation (mean [SD] duration of operation, 170.99 [105.03] minutes). The real-time prediction model constructed with the use of preoperative and intraoperative parameters significantly outperformed the preoperative prediction model (area under the receiver characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.972; 95% CI, 0.968-0.976 vs AUROC, 0.824; 95% CI, 0.813-0.834 in the SNUH internal validation data set; P < .001). Patients with the highest massive transfusion index (ie, >90th percentile) had a 47.5-fold increased risk for a massive transfusion compared with those with a lower massive transfusion index (ie, <80th percentile). The real-time prediction model also showed excellent performance in the external validation data set (AUROC of 0.943 [95% CI, 0.919-0.961] in BMC). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this prognostic study suggest that the real-time prediction model for massive transfusion showed high accuracy of prediction performance, enabling early intervention for high-risk patients. It suggests strong confidence in artificial intelligence-assisted clinical decision support systems in the operating field.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalHemodynamic MonitoringArtificial IntelligenceBlood PressureBlood TransfusionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID36515949
PMCPMC9856486
OpenAlexW4311473225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.