Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36515815›Full record

SynthesisPharmacoEconomics2023

Caregiver Burden of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Systematic Review.

Erik Landfeldt, Sophia Abner, Astrid Pechmann, Thomas Sejersen, Hugh J McMillan, Hanns Lochmüller, Janbernd Kirschner

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PharmacoEconomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The caregiver burden of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erik Landfeldt *IQVIA, Pyramidvägen 7, 169 56, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden. erik.landfeldt@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5758-7151
Sophia Abner *IQVIA, London, UK.
Astrid PechmannDepartment of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Thomas SejersenDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hugh J McMillanDepartment of Pediatrics, Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Hanns LochmüllerDepartment of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Janbernd KirschnerDepartment of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of our study was to review, synthesize, and grade published evidence of caregiver burden of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a rare autosomal-recessive neuromuscular disease.

methodsWe searched Embase and PubMed for full-text articles published from inception up until 28 February, 2022, reporting results from studies of caregiver burden (i.e., negative aspects of providing informal care) in SMA. Two investigators independently screened article titles and abstracts for eligibility, reviewed full-text versions of selected records, extracted the data, and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The evidence was synthesized to answer the following questions: (1) In which geographical settings have the caregiver burden of SMA been studied? (2) What aspects of the caregiver burden of SMA have been investigated? (3) What instruments have been used to measure the caregiver burden of SMA? (4) What is known of the caregiver burden of SMA? (5) How is the caregiver burden of SMA impacted by available disease-modifying drugs?

resultsWe identified 15 publications, covering samples from a total of ten countries (i.e., Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Romania, Spain, Turkey, the UK, and the USA), reporting estimates of caregiver burden derived using data recorded via surveys or interviews. The most common instruments used to measure caregiver burden were the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview, the EQ-5D-5L, and the PedsQL Family Impact Model. Caregiving in SMA was found to be associated with reduced health-related quality of life, impaired family function, depression and anxiety, strain, and stress, as well as a substantial impact on work life and productivity. Evidence of the impact of disease-modifying drugs on caregiver burden in SMA was scarce.

conclusionsCaregivers to patients with SMA were found to be subject to a significant burden, including impaired health-related quality of life, reduced work ability and productivity, and financial stress, and many devote a substantial proportion of their time to provide informal care. Yet, the current body of literature is relatively scarce and more research is needed to better understand the clinical implications of informal caregiving in SMA and the relationship between caregiver burden and SMA types, as well as the impact of new disease-modifying treatments. Our synthesis will be helpful in informing clinical and social support programs (e.g., the routine screening of depression among caregivers, as well as financial support schemes to help manage the long-term day-to-day care) directed towards families caring for patients with SMA.

Indexed as

Muscular Atrophy, SpinalQuality of LifeCaregiver BurdenCaregiversCost of IllnessHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.